CrookesBlade
Well-Known Member
Tuchel was praised for generally picking players on form rather than reputation/past performances for England but I can’t help thinking we’ve seen why previous managers have gone with players they see as tried and tested despite club form.We got the job done last night and without playing well. That’s a positive.
Beyond that there are so many questions and most relate to the players we’ve taken and some we’ve left at home.
I think there’s a number of options of RB that Tuchel could’ve taken, I’d have taken James, despite his injury record. But i think whatever your view on who should be there, Spence would never be on the list.
The decision to play Madueke and Rashford was also dubious when there are other players that could fill the roles, left at home. Cole Palmer, Foden and Gibbs-White give us more attacking options. We’ve just not seen consistency with Madueke, Rashford and Gordon.
We’ve played 45 mins of decent attacking football in four games, in stadia and conditions which haven’t been extreme.
What worries me is that we play so slowly, despite possession, we don’t ramp things up. As shearer said, it’s pass, pass, pass, right, then pass, pass, pass, left. Nobody wanted to go past players. Madueke seemed to prefer cutting in but looked dangerous when he went outside. Rashford made some awful decisions.
Gordon didn’t do too much except doing things at speed.
Against Mexico, we have to be smarter, we need to solve the RB problem, the wing problem and bring more pace into our attacks.
I’d also drop Pickford but he’s not going to do that
It would be a shame if he gets the boot after this tournament as it’s not solely down to him, we seem to be back to having players scared to death when they pull on the England shirt. That said having Maguire and Cole Palmer in the squad would have strengthened us significantly.
Having Spence in the squad is dropping the bar right back to where it was in the early 90s when Carlton Palmer or Andy Sinton helped themselves to a few caps.

