Harry's Game
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2013
- Messages
- 15,552
- Reaction score
- 40,441
Post all views here..
I'll start...
What a prick!
I'll start...
What a prick!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Promises a lot but sadly delivers little. The polar opposite in style to Flynn, the same output - Next to nothing.
UTB
Been working, was it another nobhead moment? As in a three match ban AGAIN FFS
8 games missing due to suspension is bad for a full season, that for less then half way through the season is inexplicable. I like his pace as it's always a threat when he can stay on his feet but his temperament is exactly what we don't need right now.
Sack list this week; Brandy, King & Lappin. What's depressing is we have a sizeable squad without anybody I feel is worthy of being in the 1st team (except Hill, McGinn, Doyle & Miller).
8 games missing due to suspension is bad for a full season, that for less then half way through the season is inexplicable. I like his pace as it's always a threat when he can stay on his feet but his temperament is exactly what we don't need right now.
Sack list this week; Brandy, King & Lappin. What's depressing is we have a sizeable squad without anybody I feel is worthy of being in the 1st team (except Hill, McGinn, Doyle & Miller).
With, I believe, not a single goal or assist this season, can we just consider it several weeks wages saved? I do.Five match ban this time I believe...
At least we make up for poor permanent signings with great loan ones. :-(I hope he reads this thread, but I suppose he'll be too busy brushing his ego. I hate it that we always seem to buy the wrong type - got to get rid.
Without wishing to defend Brandly, who obviously should show more discipline, I understand his "violent conduct" was pushing a Shrewsbury player after the latter had fouled him and then had words with him.
It seems to me nonsense that that sort of stupid but not really violent behaviour should be classed in the same way as punching or kicking an opponent.
Last time however, he did just boot a bloke. My sympathies are marginal.
Last time however, he did just boot a bloke. My sympathies are marginal.
Oh, I don't have sympathy for him, just thing this whole "hands on is a sending off rule is a bit silly. But as ever in this day and age, refs are not allowed to make subjective judgments.
Player gets fouled and fouler then goads foullee. Foullee reacts by pushing fouler. Taking the provocation into account, I would say that a sensible decision would be a yellow for both players and a warning that any more crap like that and they will be off. However, given the rigid law, the ref cannot apply that level of common sense.
What he saidAbsolutely stupid and unforgivably unprofessional. Fine him.
the Sunderland v Newcastle ref allowed tiote to stay on after pushing an opponent hard to the face last Sunday..Agree refs have no discretion and the game is worse off for it. However, Brandy like everyone else who manages, plays, refs or watches knows the consequences. He strikes me as not being fully adult yet. Maybe he never will be !
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?