This is the kind of thinking that keeps poor managers in a job. When they go, it's all our fault - we're 'impatient' etc. Maybe it would help if, before the latest poor manager is sacked, we had some idea of a decent replacement - somebody who's not out of work, somebody who has evidence of success in the last couple of years. If we didn't keep employing poor managers, maybe we wouldn't have this merry-go-round?
I think we all understand the problems any manager of United faces - a board without ambition and which sells any asset and replaces them with patently poor alternatives. But that cannot excuse tactical ineptness (which we've seen far too many times this season), the one-eyed acceptance of a clearly over-the-hill Hammond, the shocking use of substitutes. Even the 'heroic' display at Old Trafford illustrated Adkins' mindset - defend from minute one and hope for...what?
He was on FH on Friday saying 'I've asked the players to be more positive.' Asked? Fucking asked? Who's in charge here?