Carlton Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
- Messages
- 15,158
- Reaction score
- 25,942
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I wonder what the £2.5m insurance claim was?
I doubt it. Probably more to do with having to play behind closed doors etc.JOC?
I wonder what the £2.5m insurance claim was?
Sales are reported in the accounts as the difference between book value and income. Purchases are written off over the length of the contract so while on the face of it Wolves' net transfer spend last season was £(25)m (£81m spent, £56m brought in); in the accounts they can record a profit on disposal. FWIW a quick scan suggests that they would have included most of the £41m for Diogo Jota to Liverpool, the £16m for Helder Costa to Leeds and £15m for Matt Doherty to Spurs.Xant remember wolves selling anyone of note to make such a profit.
In fact didnt they spaff 35m out on that silva lad
Some of the wage bills are mental.
You were stating the obvious and telling people what they already knowthis news has come has come as huge surprised me because, i was told definitively on shoutbox when this was discussed, that i was wrong when i said that. we have had lowest wage bill, effectively a championship wage bill in the premier league
i was wrong also when i said the prince was just playing with house money & we only spent what we brought in. i was said that was wrong it was upwards of 40 million + & turns out it was 1million a year. the fulham owner did more in 4 days than prince in 5 years
obviously i wasnt stating the obvious because i was quite told definitively, that everything i thought of & read about the prince was wrong, then these details came out & turns out i was on the right lines all along . it was on shoutbox so i cant go back & bring up who the discussion was with.You were stating the obvious and telling people what they already know
Xant remember wolves selling anyone of note to make such a profit.
In fact didnt they spaff 35m out on that silva lad
Sales are reported in the accounts as the difference between book value and income. Purchases are written off over the length of the contract so while on the face of it Wolves' net transfer spend last season was £(25)m (£81m spent, £56m brought in); in the accounts they can record a profit on disposal. FWIW a quick scan suggests that they would have included most of the £41m for Diogo Jota to Liverpool, the £16m for Helder Costa to Leeds and £15m for Matt Doherty to Spurs.
They did. They also recorded £61m profit on player sales which is what I was responding toWolves' £145m profit figure includes £127m of debt written off (by their owner).
We paid too much for average players, one example £30k a week for McBurnie or £40k that would have secured Ollie Watkins at the timeAnd people say we overpaid
Think the majority if people were well aware of the situation.obviously i wasnt stating the obvious because i was quite told definitively, that everything i thought of & read about the prince was wrong, then these details came out & turns out i was on the right lines all along . it was on shoutbox so i cant go back & bring up who the discussion was with.
ive always said with the prince, i think how he is trying to run the football club is commendable & if i was in charge of the EFL, i would make sure that every team had to break even. but if your in a league admiration & well run club is in majority of cases a unsuccessful club. because EFL are absoulte clowns & have made it so you have to risk the clubs future just to compete, barring a freak season
Nobody has ever argued with either of those points. You're doing Strawman again. We spent all the money, just more on fees than wagesthis news has come has come as huge surprised me because, i was told definitively on shoutbox when this was discussed, that i was wrong when i said that. we have had lowest wage bill, effectively a championship wage bill in the premier league
i was wrong also when i said the prince was just playing with house money & we only spent what we brought in. i was said that was wrong it was upwards of 40 million + & turns out it was 1million a year. the fulham owner did more in 4 days than prince in 5 years
£40k? What are you on about????We paid too much for average players, one example £30k a week for McBurnie or £40k that would have secured Ollie Watkins at the time
We paid too much for average players, one example £30k a week for McBurnie or £40k that would have secured Ollie Watkins at the time
I was told before Villa came in it was agreed, £40k is far more than he was on previouslyI reckon Ollie Watkins is on more than £40k per week - and as much as it pains me to say it, what's to say he would choose to join us over Aston Villa in any case?
75 mateI was told before Villa came in it was agreed, £40k is far more than he was on previously
75 mate
His salary was 3.9 million a year
this news has come has come as huge surprised me because, i was told definitively on shoutbox when this was discussed, that i was wrong when i said that. we have had lowest wage bill, effectively a championship wage bill in the premier league
i was wrong also when i said the prince was just playing with house money & we only spent what we brought in. i was said that was wrong it was upwards of 40 million + & turns out it was 1million a year. the fulham owner did more in 4 days than prince in 5 years
Yes but the Prince has disappeared with all money and nobody's mended fax machine yetSo lets cut to the chase.....are we in the hunt for Haaland???
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?