Hang on. You have me confused here. You are saying that:
a. We play a passing game this season.
b. We have a better playing style
But:
a. We have a new manager and largely a new team
b. We still play on the same pitch
Now, just to clarify. Last season, we didn't play a passing game because we neither had the players capable of, the tactics are different (which are irrelevant of playing surfaces, because we still win away on non-Desso pitches this season) and we had a manager who couldn't motivate or strategize effectively against oppositions. But miraculously, this season because we have a Desso, McCabe's brilliant masterplan of buying the fucker is a doozy. Yet Bert still fails to answer the question or even shape the posit:
Why have we won on non-Desso pitches in the past (and this season) with the passing game, and some which have been effectively cowfields?
Doesn't Bert think he is being just a leetle beet fallacious with the real reasons why we are winning (Manager/Players and acquisition and hopefully retention thereof) rather than using this as some pointless Desso-fest with which to justify fuck all?
... here it comes, as predictable as the 33 bus used to be ...
Yup. Box ticked. Bigger Blade Qualifying Statement.
pommpey