georgebernardshaw
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 15,089
- Reaction score
- 25,123
Can I just apologise to you,I don't know why I quoted you,it was meant for Alfreton who is the one peddling the rubbish.
Sorry
Freudian slip, Fred
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Can I just apologise to you,I don't know why I quoted you,it was meant for Alfreton who is the one peddling the rubbish.
Sorry
No the fault was entirely mine,let me buy you dinner at my Club
Attercliffe Non Pots is shut Fred.
Well aren't you an aggressive fellow? Is this simply because I don't appear to agree with you opinion on this particular matter?I suggest you are talking nonsense just because it suits your agenda,you seem to have swallowed the 500k bit as well,again because it suits,several posters yesterday were telling us it was nowhere near that figure,but you are not interested in that are you?
I'm not the one getting overly excited nor keeping any rumors going, I'm saying him comment hold up against logic, given the information currently available.Why are you getting your knickers in a twist about something a known critic of SUFC has written? He talks shit and will continue to do so where we are concerned, to try and paint us as a pariah club, whereas his beloved 'Ammers are the salt of the Earth.
Nobody is spending £500,000.
Why do you want to keep rumours like this going? Just enjoy the end of the season, then see what comes out later after we have had chance to assess his injury.
I'm not the one getting overly excited nor keeping any rumors going, I'm saying him comment hold up against logic, given the information currently available.
Can I ask how you know nobody is spending £500,000, as I mentioned yesterday this figure, plus the fact that he's not a proven Championship player, are the major reasons the deal smells a bit odd?
"That part of the ground is now named the Redbrik Estate Agency Stand — it was never more than an opportunist gimmick to involve Ennis-Hill, anyway — so is no longer an issue"
I sense this chap still has a bit of a downer on us.
And WE are told to get over it.
Got it in one. Being the Mail's Chief Sports Writer, Fatboy has every sport in every country on the planet to write about, but chooses to continue his obession with the Blades (which goes back to the Warnock period). Where I think he is right is the it was never more than an opportunist gimmick to involve Ennis-Hill, anyway bit. It was an ill-judged bit of bandwagon-jumping by McCabe, for a bitch who has no connection with us whatsoever. But while Fatboy is playing the 'poor little innocent St. Jess of Ennis' card, she could have turned it down and chose not to. But, as we know, she'd promote anything if it added to her ill-deserved fortune. If she thought the Chedgate saga would harm her carefully-cultivated 'brand', she apparently had no such qualms about the utterly-venal Santander.
A bitch? Really? Think this is way over the top.
The convention here is to use the English language where possible with words arranged in an ineligible order.
RS have stirred it and you have bought it as a 100% nailed on fact.
Why not look at a few other 'facts'?
-The transfer window isn't open so we can't sign him until 1/6 earliest.
-United have not made any fanfare about this 'new' signing which is unusual to say the least, if a deal had been done.
-He scored 10 goals for Norwich and 13 for us in the Championship (plus 1 in the Prem). What is your definition of 'proven'?
If you are 'not the one keeping the rumours going', then you ought to consider changing your day job.
Out of interest, to anybody who reads the mail, has fatty Samuel posted anything positive over the last few weeks about how well we have been playing?
Just add a bit about 'mysterious Muslim co-owner', how West Ham won the World Cup and some made up shit immigrants and that's his Mail column for the next ten years (which is all that's required as 90% of Mail readers will have died of old age by then)."Unfairly, Sheffield United have been putting out better teams than their opponents and - in the 21st Century believe it or not - playing "better" football and scoring more goals than them. Unbelievable,but that's McCabe and Warnock for you.
Meanwhile, as poor West Ham struggle in their tax payer funded Stadium - raided today by HMRC, a branch of McCabes Evil Skull Island based Scarborough Group - there is still the question mark over Steve Kabba's transfer... .... "
Continued forever
Much as I detest the man, he at least does raise the question some of us have considered which is, why? No I don't want a debate about it. It's covered by "it's a gamble that may or may not pay off apparently".
Ched Evans has scored five goals for Chesterfield in League One this season
I thought Ched had scored 7.
Yeah, yeah we all hate him. He's a cunt and all that. None of that is denied but the above comment is valid. It was a cheap and opportunist chance to cash in. No one really argued this at the time so in the spirit of playing the post rather than the poster perhaps some should actually read what he has said. It doesn't appear biased, nor would I say it is anything other than another opinion to add to the pile. He is a journalist and this is his job.
I read the article and had no real beef with it.
Did you see him in that season ? He was unplayable ,a very good player ,so we know he has the ability ,we have better backroom staff and facilities than Chesterfield plus a whole 4 months to work with him ( IF we are signing him ). He hasn't had a major injury it is just fitness . We have a great hungry player if this is handled right.So why Sheffield United would recruit the bottom club's goal-shy striker is a mystery,
That in a nutshell is what I can't get my head around, a player who had one good season in the 3rd tier, was hardly prolific in the Championship, mediocre season this year, five years older and appears to have a recurring injury problem. If it happens I can't wait for CW interview explaining the reasoning behind the signing, unless this a sign of the player investment to come hope not.
He's a racist as well? what a twat.the same man wrote the article only a football crowd would applaud a rapist
However since labelling him a rapist back then I dont recall him in the interest of fairness retracting calling him a rapist since he was cleared
until he accepts he was cleared any views from him are badly tainted by prejudice
hes making judgements not in line with the new facts
more a fredian slip freudFreudian slip, Fred
I don't see how that differs from what you are doing, apart from I'm not being grumpy about it.
Oh so you don't believe this is happening?
Happy to leave it there until the deal is confirmed, although at that point I would assume there would be no point discussing it because it will have already happened?
Did you see him in that season ? He was unplayable ,a very good player ,so we know he has the ability ,we have better backroom staff and facilities than Chesterfield plus a whole 4 months to work with him ( IF we are signing him ). He hasn't had a major injury it is just fitness . We have a great hungry player if this is handled right.
CW has repeatedly said he wont pay over the odds, IMO that is well over.
An excellent point.

My word is my Eurobond, as a certain Mr A Daley was fond of saying.
Greatest post of the week/year!!
is eurobond similar to no nailsGreatest post of the week/year!!
funny .. i agree with him"That part of the ground is now named the Redbrik Estate Agency Stand — it was never more than an opportunist gimmick to involve Ennis-Hill, anyway — so is no longer an issue"
I sense this chap still has a bit of a downer on us.
And WE are told to get over it.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?