I also think what we're seeing is a lad that is slowly playing his way into confidence and form, so he's probably consciously toning down some of the more risky elements of his game. I'm sure that in time we'll start to see more of those driving runs and quick turns that set up attacks.
I appear to be in a minority but I still believe he had a good game yesterday, overall. A better first half yes, but even with a weaker second half, still good. It's not likely to be a coincidence that as a team we were worse in the second half throughout the team (with the odd exception).
Just a final point. I see a lot of people making direct comparisons between Berge and Norwood. At first glance that may seem logical given that last night he played in the role that Norwood usually plays. I'd argue that those comparisons are futile though. Wilder wasn't trying to buy a carbon copy of Oliver Norwood when he brought Berge in. Why would he? You can only play one at a time in the current system. It is by design, not accident that Wilder has brought someone in who is not just 'another Norwood'. I think it's obvious that Berge is part of a gradual evolution in the way that we play but in the short term he will bring something different to Norwood, Fleck and Lundstram and give us additional options. You simply won't get like for like performances from any of them if and when they play each others roles (which is obviously rare anyway because we have such a specific way of playing with roles within that). I think Wilder will be looking toward developing the team into one which can control possession more in the Premier League, akin to the way we were able to a level down in the Championship. If that is the case then I believe Berge will bring a lot to the table and I'm looking forward to it.
I just hope as fans we can be patient with Berge and any other newbies for that matter; it must be tough coming into such a well-oiled machine and to make your mark immediately.