Outgoing? Peck

[Blademan89]

 

[dc_blade]

West Ham have also been linked with Hackney at Boro, who is a better player than Peck at this stage of his development. But Hackney will be on the radar of a lot of PL clubs this summer.

 

[Yellarbellyblade]

Peck is developing well but this feels a big step up especially when we were saying he probably wouldn’t start in our midfield if we’d gone up.

 

[DronnieBlade]

Sadly, this would make a lot of sense.

Be a bit like the Osula deal to Newcastle.

Except I’d be holding out for more than £10m based on potential.

UTB

 

[CaptainMorgans]

Sadly, this would make a lot of sense.

Be a bit like the Osula deal to Newcastle.

Except I’d be holding out for more than £10m based on potential.

UTB

Yeah, 100%.
Peck isn't pure potential in the way Osula was. He has 40 games under his belt at the top of the division.

 

[Alex Cheeseright]

Depending on who we bring in this summer, I don't think peckster is going anywhere. He's under contract, seen as the future with Ollie A and not ready for the Big Show. Only positive about not going up is well see a better Peck next season and then he'll be Prem ready.....with us!!

 

[ben1987]

No doubting he’s ambitious. Wilder was even quoted jokingly saying that Sydie reckons he should be playing at Real Madrid but he’s given off the vibe he’s loved every minute of this season. The effort, the work rate, crazy celebrations and being front and centre in player / fan interactions.

IF he does go, I’m sure it’ll be one of those scenarios where it works for both parties.

 

[Champagneblade]

Demand 20m for Peck.

Spend 3m on Doyle.

Simples

 

[ormester]

West Ham don’t have the money because of psr they want peck on the cheap

 

[ormester]

Demand 20m for Peck.

Spend 3m on Doyle.

Simples

At his age 30 m easily

 

[mattbianco1]

Demand 20m for Peck.

Spend 3m on Doyle.

Simples

Where has this £3m for Doyle come from? Seen it suggested a few times now that he would cost £3m and I'd have thought Wolves would be looking for £10-15m

 

[Berkshire Blade]

Where has this £3m for Doyle come from? Seen it suggested a few times now that he would cost £3m and I'd have thought Wolves would be looking for £10-15m

Because that's what wolves paid for him.

Totally forgetting it was part of a deal with them selling a player to man city

 

[3Cheers4Ramirez]

Demand 20m for Peck.

Spend 3m on Doyle.

Simples

Sounds good but Doyle and Peck would be our best partnership to start the season so I'd be reluctant. If you're left with Doyle, Arblaster and Davies there's a a lack of bite

 

[ben1987]

Where has this £3m for Doyle come from? Seen it suggested a few times now that he would cost £3m and I'd have thought Wolves would be looking for £10-15m

Twitter / X seemed to suggest that was their asking price amidst a loose link to us and Sunderland.
Not sure how credible the source was.

He’ll be on far bigger money than peck and while it was under previous ownership we couldn’t sign him before as he refused a relegation wage drop.

 

[Keen Blade]

Sounds good but Doyle and Peck would be our best partnership to start the season so I'd be reluctant. If you're left with Doyle, Arblaster and Davies there's a a lack of bite

Two of those three cannot in any sense be relied upon to be fit enough to make a contribution.
No one will know whether Blaster will ever be the same player until he's returned and played a run of games.
Davies is made of biscuits and we gave him a 3 year contract
I hope the wages reflect the risk we took.

 

[FTPE]

Where has this £3m for Doyle come from? Seen it suggested a few times now that he would cost £3m and I'd have thought Wolves would be looking for £10-15m

Ramble Blade channel went hard with it earlier.
That guy who eats on the videos kept mentioning it. I'm not saying its true (we all know he was part of a makeway) I'm just saying that's where a lot of people will have got it from.

 

[mattbianco1]

Because that's what wolves paid for him.

Totally forgetting it was part of a deal with them selling a player to man city

Ramble Blade channel went hard with it earlier.
That guy who eats on the videos kept mentioning it. I'm not saying its true (we all know he was part of a makeway) I'm just saying that's where a lot of people will have got it from.

Thanks.
Not a chance he goes for £3m then, is there.

I'd say minimum £8m but as I said above, Wolves will want over £10m I'd expect

 

[CirenBlade]

Ramble Blade channel went hard with it earlier.
That guy who eats on the videos kept mentioning it. I'm not saying its true (we all know he was part of a makeway) I'm just saying that's where a lot of people will have got it from.

The "guy" you are referring eating whilst on the channel hasn't been on since! You've got people mixed up.

 

[Frank the tank]

Because that's what wolves paid for him.

Totally forgetting it was part of a deal with them selling a player to man city

Its what they are believed to be willing to accept according to reliable sources

 

[FTPE]

Thanks.
Not a chance he goes for £3m then, is there.

I'd say minimum £8m but as I said above, Wolves will want over £10m I'd expect

Yeah I'd say £7-8m.
It depends how much Sunderland want him I suppose. Then again, I can't see us spending any money like that unless we lose Gug, Peck or Blaster. He doesn't currently fit either, but if any of those 3 go we'll easily have the money to cover it.
But, £3m? Not a prayer.

 

[FTPE]

The "guy" you are referring eating whilst on the channel hasn't been on since! You've got people mixed up.

Oh?
Was he the fitness guy?
My apologies to the Mountain fella then. I thought he'd just got more likeable.

 

[Belvedere Blade]

 

[FriethBlade]

Sounds good but Doyle and Peck would be our best partnership to start the season so I'd be reluctant. If you're left with Doyle, Arblaster and Davies there's a a lack of bite

Doyle and Peck in midfield? We'd better have a strike force that score 40 plus goals as there's none coming from those two!

 

[MKY]

Think we’ll have him for at least 1 more season.

 

[Frank the tank]

Doyle and Peck in midfield? We'd better have a strike force that score 40 plus goals as there's none coming from those two!

0Yeah we'd really miss the goal contribution of Peck and souza this season

 

[FriethBlade]

0Yeah we'd really miss the goal contribution of Peck and souza this season

Whoosh....that's my point

 

[3Cheers4Ramirez]

Doyle would score a few, and in a team minus Souza that plays more fluidly maybe Peck would get a couple as well. There are also another 3 attacking midfielders in our formation....

 

[Pollingtonblade]

No doubting he’s ambitious. Wilder was even quoted jokingly saying that Sydie reckons he should be playing at Real Madrid but he’s given off the vibe he’s loved every minute of this season. The effort, the work rate, crazy celebrations and being front and centre in player / fan interactions.

IF he does go, I’m sure it’ll be one of those scenarios where it works for both parties.

Yeah it will be a Great Bit of Business

 

[Frank the tank]

Whoosh....that's my point

You said we'
d need 40 goal strikers
If we had doyle and Peck as they will score zero goals
Well we didn't have 40 goal strikers this season with zero goals from Peck and souza
So you're wrong

 

[brownblade]

You said we'
d need 40 goal strikers
If we had doyle and Peck as they will score zero goals
Well we didn't have 40 goal strikers this season with zero goals from Peck and souza
So you're wrong

I believe you're both kind of correct. Just meet in the middle. We need more goals from midfield, which we've missed.