Generally agree with you. Although I thought Choudhury was only good if you judge him through the lens of his slightly limited ability. He got around the pitch and put his foot in. That’s a credit to him. But he offers very little when we have the ball.
You're right, but that's also all that we can reasonably expect from him.
He was brought in to be a midfield destroyer, we're all familiar enough with Chodhury to know he doesn't do much with the ball.
What he can do, he did exceptionally well. And I don't think we've been able to say that enough about him in his short stint here.
The real key thing for me was the pressing in advanced areas. That's what Souza does, and we looed a lot better for it.
----
In possession, it seems that Wilder wants us to go to a 3 , with Choudhury as an additional CB and the full backs pushed higher up the pitch.
It's not a bad idea, but the execution is off. If we had Arblaster, it could work (maybe even Tom Davies). Someone that can take it on the turn and move it quickly.
Peck is a lot of things, but he doesn't do that consistently and the opposition know it. They stick tight to him and take him out of the game. We then have no midfield and our performances are disjointed.
We have to find another way.