SUFC Guy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 9,666
- Reaction score
- 13,426
1. Depends whether you mean generally or in the context of the thread. If he were to leave for Sunderland, I wouldn't lose much sleep over it, put it that way. In terms of a general dismissal, he's not there yet but it's certainly getting on towards it. All the talk of his past is completely redundant, i'll judge him on what he does for my football club and thus far he's come across as a bag of hot air that struck lucky with a team full of future England internationals sitting in the Southampton academy. What would we be saying if Parkinson had gone about things the way Adkins has? I'm pretty sure there wouldn't be posters with metaphorical pitchforks at the ready, waiting to pounce on anyone that dared criticise him, and dare I say there'd be a few calling for him out. Does the history of an individual all of a sudden swoop in and put an extra 3 points to our name every time we lose? You can consider one's achievements when selecting a manager, granted, as you'd be right to think that a more achieving manager will more than likely to go on and achieve more with your club. But when that manager does everything he can to go against that prediction, and quite shockingly makes some of the most basic of management errors, it's quite easy to conclude his supposed history has gone out the window.
2. I wouldn't put a name on the manager I'd appoint, as that's really not feasible from a hypothetical stand point, but a manager that grasps the most basic of recruitment would be a start, and better than what we have seen so far. I wouldn't say we'd have to push the boat out too far to find that attribute, and isn't that telling of how our current manager has gone about things? An old school, no-nonsense, "you're getting bollocked if you fail to show any passion or grit" type manager would do wonders for the soft-centred ethos we seemed to have imposed. A shared realisation of quite how much the squad needs to change to succeed would also be a preferred requirement. Along with a pre-agreed sense of priority positions with regards to transfers in to the club. Something the board might have missed off their interview check list perhaps?
So for the record that's..
1. Yes
2. No
BB, I think you are being far too harsh on NA. He has clearly inherited a team that has proven to be nge for league 1.
You can only really judge him when he has had the chance to mould his own team. You cannot simply change the personnel over night, It will take 2 seasons at least. Also look where changing the manager too often has got us up to now - NOWHERE!
Ffs give the guy more than 11 games please ! If we are in a mess come Feb then I could possibly understand some of your comments.