Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Do we even play "goalie wag" any more ???
Done would have dealt with it no dangerIts the look on Done's face afterwards. He just stands there looking at our Jay as though to say "What the Fook were you doing"!
No idea what he has to do to get some people to say he's not good enough.
For a penalty the handball has to be deliberate, that's the old rule and more recently it's handball if the hand is 'in an un-natural position' and gains an advantage.
McEveley did not deliberately handle that ball, he had what is called an 'involuntary reaction' after his back foot slipped beneath him.
However, his hand was in an ' unnatural position' when he handled the ball - penalty, no booking - was there a booking?
The ref could have been excused for not giving a penalty by the strict letter of the law but that would have been brave.
For a penalty the handball has to be deliberate, that's the old rule and more recently it's handball if the hand is 'in an un-natural position' and gains an advantage.
McEveley did not deliberately handle that ball, he had what is called an 'involuntary reaction' after his back foot slipped beneath him.
However, his hand was in an ' unnatural position' when he handled the ball - penalty, no booking - was there a booking?
The ref could have been excused for not giving a penalty by the strict letter of the law but that would have been brave.
For a penalty the handball has to be deliberate, that's the old rule and more recently it's handball if the hand is 'in an un-natural position' and gains an advantage.
McEveley did not deliberately handle that ball, he had what is called an 'involuntary reaction' after his back foot slipped beneath him.
However, his hand was in an ' unnatural position' when he handled the ball - penalty, no booking - was there a booking?
The ref could have been excused for not giving a penalty by the strict letter of the law but that would have been brave.
If the ref had not given a penalty for that he would have been banned from reffing for 1800 years.
It was Paul Durkin who usually was a decent refThe ref at the Wimbledon game with Magic Fashanu wasn't.
It was Paul Durkin who usually was a decent ref
I was behind that goal with the Wimbledon fans, couldnt believe what Fash didWell that was an error of Rob **** Styles proportions. I remember the crowds amazement firstly at Fashanu and secondly at no penalty being awarded.
Did I say Rob Styles is a ****?
Play badly.
He's been fine for weeks/months.
For a penalty the handball has to be deliberate, that's the old rule and more recently it's handball if the hand is 'in an un-natural position' and gains an advantage.
McEveley did not deliberately handle that ball, he had what is called an 'involuntary reaction' after his back foot slipped beneath him.
However, his hand was in an ' unnatural position' when he handled the ball - penalty, no booking - was there a booking?
The ref could have been excused for not giving a penalty by the strict letter of the law but that would have been brave.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?