Flatulent_Bob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2009
- Messages
- 15,068
- Reaction score
- 20,760
You've been away? Bollocks I wish I'd known (although I do think it was mentioned) I would of certainly gone with something more harsh than "Child". 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Would have been interesting to see what questions were actually put forward to him.
As it stands it's a poor article that poses more questions than it answers
What a dreadful thread.
You've more chance of finding a unicorn in Rotherham. Remember that it's the same chap who when asked if he'd attended the Q&A session with McCabe to put his questions directly to the Chairman of Sheffield United refused to even give a yes or no answer. So if "yes" or "no" are beyond his reach then "sorry" is going to be light years away. He will no doubt see nothing to apologise for, in the same way that a blinkered horse sees nothing other than the route straight ahead, unable to accept that there may be other horses involved and under the impression that he is alone in the field.......now the thread is winding down, and the debate ending - it really is time that he apologised to the admins for his comments. Whilst I welcome the debates he causes and the differences of opinion he brings, IMO our Forum would be better off without him if he doesn't have the courage to say sorry to Foxy and Linz at this point. Show some guts Len - apologise for the offence you recognise you've given - or failing that, have the decency to go and post on some other poor bugger's forum.
You've more chance of finding a unicorn in Rotherham. Remember that it's the same chap who when asked if he'd attended the Q&A session with McCabe to put his questions directly to the Chairman of Sheffield United refused to even give a yes or no answer. So if "yes" or "no" are beyond his reach then "sorry" is going to be light years away. He will no doubt see nothing to apologise for, in the same way that a blinkered horse sees nothing other than the route straight ahead, unable to accept that there may be other horses involved and under the impression that he is alone in the field.
But now the thread is winding down, and the debate ending - it really is time that he apologised to the admins for his comments. Whilst I welcome the debates he causes and the differences of opinion he brings, IMO our Forum would be better off without him if he doesn't have the courage to say sorry to Foxy and Linz at this point. Show some guts Len - apologise for the offence you recognise you've given - or failing that, have the decency to go and post on some other poor bugger's forum.
On the downside the Countdown clock won't be the right one for the job, but on the upside Rachel Riley has got a lovely arse. We'll probably need a calendar, but here's a gratuitous arse shot anyway.
![]()
She'd get it.
UTB
On the downside the Countdown clock won't be the right one for the job, but on the upside Rachel Riley has got a lovely arse. We'll probably need a calendar, but here's a gratuitous arse shot anyway.
![]()
She reminds me of that annoying Welsh bird who was in that comedy with James Cordon. Stick that in your mathematics
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?