McCabe has to go

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




If we are to get anywhere in the next few years McCabe has to sell up along with the fake sheikh.

This window was the perfect opportunity to show a bit of ambition. Nothing crazy just the opportunity to back wilder and see what he can do with a bit of sensible investment. Considering we've received 6/7 million in sales.

And we have spent nothing we've made a profit of 4/5 million. McCabe please leave


I'm with you all the way here brother . Just one thing wrong with your brilliant message though . McCabe has made 100's of millions off the back of us . To cap it all off I know for a FACT that he parks his Bentley Convertible at home on a Desso Driveway .

There's taking the piss and then there's serious pisstaking...... McRobber, do one, you've been sussed out :mad:
 
You start off saying we won't spend anything like last year but go onto say the Brooks money will fund the summer signings. Which are?
If the Brooks money goes on the team - depending which of your claims is to be believed obviously, who funds any losses?

The brooks money will mean that the board can use it
You start off saying we won't spend anything like last year but go onto say the Brooks money will fund the summer signings. Which are?
If the Brooks money goes on the team - depending which of your claims is to be believed obviously, who funds any losses?

Christ it’s you again you won’t be happy until we sell all our players and turn into Rotherham will you , open your eyes McCabe will sell everyone if we get an offer , and yes players have prices but ours are much much less
 
The fact that your response was so knee-jerk tells me that you don't understand the economics of running a club. You need to take a step back, consider the reasons why some owners gamble so profligately, without too much thought to what their gambles might end up doing to their clubs. Yes, Forest are spending, just as Villa have done. Maybe you ought to think whether this is a never-ending treadmill where money can keep being invested without a thought to a day of financial reckoning?

Better still, look at the owner of the pigs, one minute spending millions, now he's not willing to spend in exactly the same manner. Why do you think that is?
Because he’s not allowed due to ffp rules ?
 
Kev doesn't have the money to mount a serious push

All it takes is spending some muneh.

Any muneh.

Just look at Forrest/Boro/Wendy/Villa to prove how spunking some dosh guarantees success.

We do need a new owner to progress,

If 'progression' equates to spunking money, then yes we do.

Personally I'd rather try to run the club well at a break even so that in the likely event we don't go up, we haven't gambled the ranch and we live to fight again.
 
The brooks money will mean that the board can use it


Christ it’s you again you won’t be happy until we sell all our players and turn into Rotherham will you , open your eyes McCabe will sell everyone if we get an offer , and yes players have prices but ours are much much less


How did your brain damage occur? Did you trap your head in a door?
 
All it takes is spending some muneh.

Any muneh.

Just look at Forrest/Boro/Wendy/Villa to prove how spunking some dosh guarantees success.



If 'progression' equates to spunking money, then yes we do.

Personally I'd rather try to run the club well at a break even so that in the likely event we don't go up, we haven't gambled the ranch and we live to fight again.
The whole look at "insert name of club" argument is silly. Do you honestly believe we wouldn't be better if Wilder had more money to spend?
Money Can be squandered , hence why wilder was factored in my original post.
How many big teams have gone bust despite years upon years of overspending? I can't think of one. In fact one such team close to ruin won the premier league a couple of years back. One such team of silly spenders just bought one of our best players because there a premier league team. Manchester city went from a relagation mid table team to champions by spunking money. QPR got to the premiership from being nothing by spunking money.
Spunking money doesn't guarantee success, but it certainly helps. Especially in the right hands. Which I think we have, don't you?
 
All it takes is spending some muneh.

Any muneh.

Just look at Forrest/Boro/Wendy/Villa to prove how spunking some dosh guarantees success.



If 'progression' equates to spunking money, then yes we do.

Personally I'd rather try to run the club well at a break even so that in the likely event we don't go up, we haven't gambled the ranch and we live to fight again.
Oh as well to counter that point, even two of the four you listed made the playoffs. Just look at the teams that got promoted.
 
The whole look at "insert name of club" argument is silly. Do you honestly believe we wouldn't be better if Wilder had more money to spend?
Money Can be squandered , hence why wilder was factored in my original post.
How many big teams have gone bust despite years upon years of overspending? I can't think of one. In fact one such team close to ruin won the premier league a couple of years back. One such team of silly spenders just bought one of our best players because there a premier league team. Manchester city went from a relagation mid table team to champions by spunking money. QPR got to the premiership from being nothing by spunking money.
Spunking money doesn't guarantee success, but it certainly helps. Especially in the right hands. Which I think we have, don't you?

Not on about spending as much as them but I guarantee they wouldn’t be selling there best players as they have owners who have ambition
 
Entirely McCabes fault - so little spent in last JTW that wisewblade89 has been bashing his head against a brick wall ever since :(

Where were we at Christmas and tell me if you actually think we spent anything other than peanuts . A great opportunity to get at least the play offs gone because McCabe wouldn’t show an ounce of ambition .

Why do you think wilder was unhappy and probably still is because he knows that he’s got nothing to work with . Wilder has only stayed because of his love for us .

I really don’t understand what most of the people who are disagreeing with me are looking at we are going no where under McCabe and have been for ten years
 
I mean it’s pretty simple

Yes a football club costs more to run than the ticket money from the fans.

Someone suggested a business model of trying to keep Brooks by offering him £ 40 grand/week (2 million/year)

Ah but it's only a few million, loose change for McCabe.

Very simple. Always is when you plan to spend someone else's money.
 



Where were we at Christmas and tell me if you actually think we spent anything other than peanuts . A great opportunity to get at least the play offs gone because McCabe wouldn’t show an ounce of ambition .

Why do you think wilder was unhappy and probably still is because he knows that he’s got nothing to work with . Wilder has only stayed because of his love for us .

I really don’t understand what most of the people who are disagreeing with me are looking at we are going no where under McCabe and have been for ten years

How do you know it was McCabe that didn't show any ambition, it could've been the Prince and that may have been what's caused McCabe to trigger the attempted buyout??

What makes you feel that the Prince has the money to satiate your need for more investment?
 
Bump bump bump

We are gonna be in the exact same position we were last year selling assets and not reinvesting , please Kevin get out of the club or we will never progress . We had the perfect opportunity in January to spend sensibly to push on and we spent nothing .
Don’t let wilders hard work be disguised as McCabes work the guy will never take us forward he will only take us backwards .

Thanks kev but let the prince takeover
What have you done for the club to take them forward recently?
 
How do you know it was McCabe that didn't show any ambition, it could've been the Prince and that may have been what's caused McCabe to trigger the attempted buyout??

What makes you feel that the Prince has the money to satiate your need for more investment?

I mean McCabe has been the common denominator for ten years so who else is holding the club back ?
 
I mean McCabe has been the common denominator for ten years so who else is holding the club back ?

But he's joint owner now, are you saying the Prince wanted to invest and McCabe said no thanks?

Care to answer the "What makes you feel that the Prince has the money to satiate your need for more investment?" question.
 
If you don’t want a team that has an owner with ambition go and support Ipswich

Eh?

Marcus Evans has put about £100m into Ipswich in the last 10 years. Obviously not in an 'ambitious' way though.

I think you need to clarify what this 'ambition' of yours means in financial terms.

It's dead easy being a big shot poster spending other people's money, but some of us live in the real world.
 

Wouldn't swap McCabe for Chansiri - no way. His football decisions are woeful and he's fleeced the fans for every penny, can't even get their kit ordered in time, changed the name of the stand from Pigs to Chansiri and appointed a transfer committee only to then disperse with it months later, you can go on and on. Hope he stays for as long as possible for me! Ha ha!
 
The whole look at "insert name of club" argument is silly. Do you honestly believe we wouldn't be better if Wilder had more money to spend?
Money Can be squandered , hence why wilder was factored in my original post.
How many big teams have gone bust despite years upon years of overspending? I can't think of one. In fact one such team close to ruin won the premier league a couple of years back. One such team of silly spenders just bought one of our best players because there a premier league team. Manchester city went from a relagation mid table team to champions by spunking money. QPR got to the premiership from being nothing by spunking money.
Spunking money doesn't guarantee success, but it certainly helps. Especially in the right hands. Which I think we have, don't you?
There are so many clubs spunking money year in year out yet only 3 can reach the promised land and every year there are 3-9 clubs with substantial parachute payments to give them a head start. The odds are stacked against you before you kick a ball unless you are prepared to put the clubs finances and future at serious risk. Is that what you want?
“Do you honestly believe we wouldn’t be better if Wilder had more money to spend?” is what you ask. Well Wilder has an increased budget and will get some of the Brooks money. What more do you want? You’ve no idea how much he’s getting so why the flouncing?
 
There are so many clubs spunking money year in year out yet only 3 can reach the promised land and every year there are 3-9 clubs with substantial parachute payments to give them a head start. The odds are stacked against you before you kick a ball unless you are prepared to put the clubs finances and future at serious risk. Is that what you want?
“Do you honestly believe we wouldn’t be better if Wilder had more money to spend?” is what you ask. Well Wilder has an increased budget and will get some of the Brooks money. What more do you want? You’ve no idea how much he’s getting so why the flouncing?
No one is thinking of putting the clubs finances and future at risk! :mad:
McCabe and family will be the patsies :rolleyes:
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom