Basically just been spinning it as wilders fault blaming, results, recruitment and anti-owner outburst with no acknowledgment of any wrongdoing on the owners side.
Well... What's the owner actually done wrong? Potential cases below
Not given wilder funds in January - wasn't much point. We were all but relegated, the signings we were apparently interested in, wouldn't have come.
Training ground delayed - covids caused massive financial losses with every single team. Unless you're a sheikh monsour, you'd be apprehensive regards money.
"Forced" wilder out with demands - only thing I could really think is the whole DOF saga. HOWEVER, put yourself in the princes shoes, I think you'd be apprehensive allowing a manager who's not spent wisely with more funds? Especially with clubs losing millions with lack of spectators and "punters"
Results - come on mate, let's be honest.. they've been absolutely appalling. If it was any other manager, he'd have been sacked long long ago.
Ultimately, I think it's a bit of both, Wilders stubborn, he's a typical Yorkshire man, with a no nonsense attitude which ultimately proved to be his downfall, or certainly assisted it.
Any manager who has a run like we've had simply cannot go into the media making demands and claims, almost angling for the bullet, calling fans or "punters" "playstation managers" due to not agreeing a system isn't working, and that the tactics are wrong.
I'd have loved for them to have met on some compromise, the prince understandably wanted some input into transfers and targets, it's not like he was saying "reyt Chris, you're playing 4-4-2 and we're getting you x y and z" he simply wanted to take some pressure and responsibility off wilders shoulders.
Both sides have been petty since he's left. Wit spouting utter shite on twatter, Phipps giving his input. In truth, nobody's opinion actually matters. We'll find out what we're allowed to find out. Everything else is pure hearsay.