Lundstrum looks like he doesn't want to be there, and as we all know he doesn't. Why he's not playing with more drive, as others say for a move elsewhere, is neyond me. Even if he's sorted out that move you'd want to impress the manager of whichever that club is.
As for Norwood. His effort is there, he certainly cares. But did anyone else notice yesterday how deep he went, vertually holding hands with Egan and in line with the defence and then leaving a man totally unmarked at the top fo the box or outside the D. This happened for Arsenal's first goal and for the chance which Lacazette put over the bar at the Stones Bitter end as I still call it!
In the same move as the Lacazette miss John Fleck allows an Arsenal player to run 50 yards from deep into the Arsenal half onto the edge of ours without even closing him down adequately, let alone make a tackle. Fleck for me has looked improved over the last 6 weeks or so but what's around him in the midfield is so poor that he looks poor also, but he does look sharp at times and is the most likely to make something happen.
Finally, and not to do with any of the midfield as such, but when Lunny gives it away Baldock's jogging back, totally leaving the eventual goalscorer to run freely to the rebound, and Baldock only starts sprinting when the Arsenal player goes for the shot. Why is he so focussed on the ball and yet leaving his man a free run in.
The above is a few of the things that stood out to me yesterday and positionally/lack of awareness of opposition players it's just not good gnough. Allow space to Arsenal and they'll punish teams. Last season v Arsenal and the season as a whole we were so much more organsised than this season. What happened yesterday is not because Berge and O'Connel are missing. Admitedly when you give the ball away like what we di too often you'll get punished but Norwood running too deep and leaving players unmarked is just basic shape related, or at least that's how it seems to me, maybe I'm missing somthing?!