Jug ears sell on clause

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Looks like Brum are refusing to sell him. It will be interesting to see how he reacts. The JEC of old would have thrown his hoverboard out of his pram.
I think Brum need to sell , so will maximize there position , there fucked as badly financially as the pigs
But at least they ( Brum ) have players other teams actually want
Unlike that lot
 



Brum not going sell until end of season, will be more like 15m then
 
However, what is an absolute indication of "good business" is selling x players, replacing them with y players and ending up in a division above in that season.
Moving Adams on (and taking your pick of Duffy, JOC, Jake Wright etc.) was a springboard to us moving in the right direction. If we can now scoop some more froth from the pool way after the event (not in a Michael Barrymore sort of way) would be a nice bit of icing on top.
Absolutely, hence my purposeful inclusion of “in itself” in my response.

Overall, raising money to do even better business is a positive.
 
Peaky Blinders just turned down a 4th bid from Burnley of £12m :mad:

Sell him ffs
 
£2m from this clause would pay for our January loan signings. That's convenient.

But the Prince and McCabe will still have to cover our losses though, Walker, Maguire, Murphy, Brooks, Adams,
We apparently have a shortfall of £5 million a year, well there's £20+ million in transfers and clauses over the last couple of years that are unexpected additional extras
 
But the Prince and McCabe will still have to cover our losses though, Walker, Maguire, Murphy, Brooks, Adams,
We apparently have a shortfall of £5 million a year, well there's £20+ million in transfers and clauses over the last couple of years that are unexpected additional extras


Basic accounting 1

Any annual shortfalls are AFTER profits on those deals. Which I'm sure you know. (£5m is the lowest recently I believe).
 
Basic accounting 1

Any annual shortfalls are AFTER profits on those deals. Which I'm sure you know. (£5m is the lowest recently I believe).

Our shortfalls were mentioned long before any of those deals were done. Those deals might never have been done, and if they weren't are we really to believe that we'd have lost £25 - £30 million over the last two years

How ? would be my question
 
Our shortfalls were mentioned long before any of those deals were done. Those deals might never have been done, and if they weren't are we really to believe that we'd have lost £25 million over the last two years

How ? would be my question

You're mixing up cash flow with losses. And cash flow with profits on player sales.

Your point should be that these deals have saved the owners putting more cash in rather than possibly suggesting the figures don't add up.
 
You're mixing up cash flow with losses. And cash flow with profits on player sales.

Your point should be that these deals have saved the owners putting more cash in rather than possibly suggesting the figures don't add up.
There was a sum in the last set of accounts showing how much we’d got from sell-ons. I remember several of us trying to work out what it was made up from, then someone remembered it included Murphy as we got some cash when Brighton were promoted.
 
You're mixing up cash flow with losses. And cash flow with profits on player sales.

Your point should be that these deals have saved the owners putting more cash in rather than possibly suggesting the figures don't add up.


Yes, badly worded probably.
My original post was that the Prince and McCabe fund shortfalls. Shortfalls that don't seem to change that much regardless of what comes in and goes out.
 
Looks like he is staying so no money til summer and he is likely to play against us :(
 



Yes, badly worded probably.
My original post was that the Prince and McCabe fund shortfalls. Shortfalls that don't seem to change that much regardless of what comes in and goes out.

The shortfall by definition is the (negative) difference between what comes in and what goes out. How else would they be calculated?
 
Imagining we go into the market for a £10 million + striker in the summer (given that Madine and Hogan are loanees), if we have a 20% sell on clause for Adams, could we buy him back in the summer and effectively get a 20% discount?
 
But I thought the sale of Brooks paid for Norwood and Egan plus others.
Don't give the club the excuse to have already used the money before they've even got it
 
Imagining we go into the market for a £10 million + striker in the summer (given that Madine and Hogan are loanees), if we have a 20% sell on clause for Adams, could we buy him back in the summer and effectively get a 20% discount?

More chance of CW signing you or I than Adams.

If the impossible does happen, I could see the club going for McBurnie if there's sufficient budget. An upgrade on Madine and appears ready for the step-up.
 
Because he didn’t want to play for us in League 1 when Wilder arrived. Can’t see him coming back.
Did you see Wilder signing madine? He seems to get along well with Billy so it wouldn't upset the dressing room. I doubt we would be able to afford him as 12-16 million is likely to be too much, more chance of getting DCL back on loan
 
According to the infamous ‘Sky sources ‘ it seems that the Blades have a 20% sell on clause should Birmingham sell. Based on the £12m that is being touted around as we sold him for £2m that would generate a £10m profit with our share then being £2m.
If this happens the sale of the Jug eared one would be another great piece of transfer business by Wilder as the add ins would have paid for Oli Norwood !
Great to see Hogan confirmed and am really looking forward to Saturday and seeing perhaps both him and Madine in action at some stage in the game
Great transfer window thus far
UTB

£12m turned down in Jan. He's improved again imo

I reckon with a little luck, a lot of interest and with age on his side, £20m could be achieved here

Let's hope that if my assumption actually proves correct, we won't actually need it come next season ;)
 



£12m turned down in Jan. He's improved again imo

I reckon with a little luck, a lot of interest and with age on his side, £20m could be achieved here

Let's hope that if my assumption actually proves correct, we won't actually need it come next season ;)
If you are right £4 m to the Blades will still come in useful whatever league we are in :D
UTB
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom