robbiez666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 18,730
- Reaction score
- 25,632
How do you know that moves to Dunfermline for players deemed not good enough wasn’t discussed from the beginning of the AI plan?
You don’t!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
How do you know that moves to Dunfermline for players deemed not good enough wasn’t discussed from the beginning of the AI plan?
You don’t!
Probably in the match day squad there and a bigger opportunity for him to play and potentially earn a better move . Let's be honest at 22 we would have probably just let his contract run without even seeing him and he'd be back in Peru where he started at 25 or so. He seems pretty happy on his signing pics too. GLTTLShite for the player and a bad look for us.
Both Caceres and Ukaki played in preseason and both did impress, but Ukaki must be higher rated as he's been in the squad for the last 2 games, starting against Birmingham.I don't like this much at all given he was supposed to be project and he got shit all chance a huge distance from home. Throw in the dodgy links between Bord and the deal and it smells like it looks.
But if we've brought him in, he's not looked good enough and he'll get shit all chance here, then a move will work well for him and it's the best all round.
Of course the second paragraph is mostly bollocks but I've tried.
He didn't have To agree to go to dunfermilineUpheaving a young lads life because we're farting about and indecisive, doesn't feel great.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?