Weasel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2016
- Messages
- 6,518
- Reaction score
- 18,680
Am i right in thinking that the lad had an option to extend his contract by a year which he took up last summer despite hardly playing for the previous 2 years..? If so (whilst i would have done the same as he will never have a contract like the one hes just been sat on) i dont really understand all the goodwill towards James and the giant injury list. Im just indifferent to the lad. Dean the 'Demon of the Lane' Hammond got fkin slated for taking up the 1 year extension despite knowing he wasnt wanted and would probably need to be paid off (which he was). So injuries apart, they both probably knew that they were taking up an extension of the contract in the full knowledge that they werent helping the club. Not knocking either for doing it as i said i would do it too in all honesty cos it was for a lot of money in each case, but each were rewarded handsomely over the years with Utd for contributing just short of fuk all.
I dont wish ill on either Hammond or Wallace but im mystified why one seems to have took us to the cleaners (not his fault his body gave up on him) for 3 years and goes with our blessing, whilst the other took us to the cleaners (not is fault his body gave up on him) and is the anti christ to many blades.
I personally thought DH was w@nk but he at least got on the pitch. Wallace was eternally injured.
Just playing devils advocate here as it seems double standards. Neither of em wanted to do badly, but their bodies dictated otherwise, and both took that extra year knowing they were just taking the money and likely to stunt the clubs playing budget. Food for thought i suppose, but to my mind there isnt a world of difference between either players ethics and using the club.
I dont wish ill on either Hammond or Wallace but im mystified why one seems to have took us to the cleaners (not his fault his body gave up on him) for 3 years and goes with our blessing, whilst the other took us to the cleaners (not is fault his body gave up on him) and is the anti christ to many blades.
I personally thought DH was w@nk but he at least got on the pitch. Wallace was eternally injured.
Just playing devils advocate here as it seems double standards. Neither of em wanted to do badly, but their bodies dictated otherwise, and both took that extra year knowing they were just taking the money and likely to stunt the clubs playing budget. Food for thought i suppose, but to my mind there isnt a world of difference between either players ethics and using the club.