Currie didn't have the pace or defensive attributes of Ndiaye or Berge. They may both end up better goalscorers. Currie was exceptionally skilful and could beat a man in different ways, more variety and ball skill involved than Berge. There were a few around who could do the same, some better at the time, maybe Ndiaye will be one day. But it was his ability to strike the ball which was so unique. I honestly can't think of any better, maybe Beckham, but Currie could use both feet, maybe Haynes, but I only have a few memories. Perhaps Hoddle was a better all round passer, because he had all those flicks and chips, but he couldn't hit it with the control and flight of Currie over a distance and didn't have his power.