Impact of relegation - Transfer Cash in and outs

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Barmyblade

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
150
Reaction score
394
Looking at the official figures taken from the SUFC website (or Soccerbase where none are supplied) then:

- In his last two seasons in charge (05/06 &06/07), Warnock made a net outlay of £12.1m (i.e. transfers out less transfers in)

- In his few months in charge (during 07/08) Robson made a net gain on transfers for the club of £6.4m

- In his time as manager, Blackwell has so far made a net gain on transfers for the club of £10.12m

This shows that:

- Warnock was well supported by the board with transfer funds during the promotion to the Premiership (which he deserved having got us there).

- since being relegated, we have brought in over £16.5m in transfers (net of all purchases), being a dramatic cash influx, especially if it is correct that we have also already received £5m from West Ham

- whilst this ignores wages (which can be very substantial), and whilst the appointment of Robson was clearly a failure, this also exposes the myth that we allowed Robson to gamble the family silver on a quick rebound to the Premiership - a myth that Warnock liked to propogate in the media after his departure. Even taking into account wages, I suspect that Hulse, Davis etc coming to a newly promoted team would have been on similar, if not higher wages, than Hendrie, Naysmith coming to a newly relegated team.

The annoying aspect for me is that the Sky Sports massive cash input into the Premiership make these fluctuations for a club such as ours necessary in order to survive. For example, compared to the clubs which came down with us, we are relatively healthy, presumably because of the sales we have made. I just hope the selling stops now!
 



Excellent post, but don't underestimate the wages of players like Beattie, Speed, Ugo, Hendrie and Naysmith.
 
Excellent post Barmyblade - My sentiments exactly
But if wages are the issue why are we signing Little, France, Perhaps Jordan when collectively you could fund a decent player for those three wages?
And why can't we get rid of Sharp?
 
And why can't we get rid of Sharp?

I know this flies in the face of what's happened in the past but I think the sale of Billy, and maybe the likes of Howard is subject to someone coming in. If nothing permanent, expect a few loans being confirmed both in and out.
 
Excellent post Barmyblade - My sentiments exactly
But if wages are the issue why are we signing Little, France, Perhaps Jordan when collectively you could fund a decent player for those three wages?
And why can't we get rid of Sharp?

Because it's common knowledge that we are now in desperate need of the 'quantity' Blackie never wanted
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom