Sothall_Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,736
- Reaction score
- 8,564
We don't have 35+ players over the age of 20
35 relates to the position we were in with NC, which was as I said a unsustainable position.
That's the bigger picture.
But we have never had 35+ Senior (aged over 20) players. Even last season under Clough the most we had at a time was about 22.
According to the list above, we currently still have 22 Senior players including Long and Kennedy who weren't 21 last season but are now.
We lost three over the Summer (Doyle, Turner and Davies) and have gained one (Woolford) leaving us with the same number overall.
I agree with the argument that we ideally need to lose 3 of the current senior players if we are going to sign another 3.
This should be achievable, as most players do not want to hang around all season with no prospect of playing.
I am not sure why people (not just you) keep trotting out the "fact" that we have a 35 man squad when we clearly don't and never have had.
Are you suggesting that we shouldn't have 11 or more Junior (20 and under) players under contract?
If so, which of these do you think we should have allowed to leave? (Reed? Calvert-Lewin? Willis? Dimaio? Whiteman? Khan? Wright?)
Are you able to state with certainty at this stage that they aren't going to make it and should therefore be released to reduce the squad size?
Our current and former coaches don't seem to think so and they're in a better position to judge than us.