Tonge was abysmal today (and for the Joey fanatics, that isn't a good thing

) his passing was poor, no commitment, no headers, but what do we expect from our least consistent performer.
The ref didn't help matters, but whilst he was right to give a penalty as it was a foul, 3 incidents within a 20 second period previous to that went against us, so it shouldn't have even got to the point where a penalty should have come close. At one point Armstrong went for a ball and got close lined, to which the ref chose to "play on" in Hull's advantage, embarrassing to say the least. There was 3 occasions in which Hull players should have got bookings too and he let them off. But when Stead deserved a yellow, he got one. Tonge's yellow was also deserved too, even if their player did make a meal of it. It seemed very biased to be honest, and surprise surprise, no reprocussions will come against this ref. We got one decision our way when BT went to head ball in, it went wide and we got a corner.
If I'm honest Hull were the better side and maybe should have had all 3 points, but the way in which they got their equalizer is highly frustrating.
Hull I've just remembered really is a shit hole.
Also the way in which we were penned in afterwards is understandable with some of the knobs are classed as "fans" these days. What I don't understand is though, why no PA was made to state we would be kept behind.
4 points in 6 is not a bad haul considering, but what is frustrating is poor performances, we wasn't the best side yesterday. And we only just edged it at Leicester in yet another poor performance.
For those who will now turn round and say "if a team can play badly and still get points thats good" well..... we can also still play badly and lose like we have done.