Sothall_Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,778
- Reaction score
- 8,711
Stupid questions based on what you believe rather than the facts which you invariably question with little knowledge tend to be frustrating. It's not like it's not happened before is it?
At least you've got a handle on it though. Or almost. McCabe owns the land. He's owned the land since he bought the club. Whatever subsidiary the land sat in, sits in or whatever, he owns it. hes always owned it. When it was on the FC's balance sheet, guess what? He still owned it. It's his. Now I know you won't believe me, but SU Ltd loses money as well. So by taking two loss making assets out of the club - and the debt that goes with it - he's actually safeguarded the football club.
Yes he's the owner of the land. Therefore all Sheffield United fans are relying on him to utilise it for the benefit of the club.
He’s done a lot of good things for the club over the years and quite a few bad.
Building a permanently loss making hotel wasn’t one of his better moves however you try to spin it.
It’s also made the club harder a less attractive prospect for any potential new investors which is what this thread is actually about.