He's gone

[northsomersetblade]

I hated 'Friends'. That other one about a group of supposed nerds is even more cringeworthy.

 

[Trigger Blade]

I don't think I've been using what you might call challenging vocabularly at all really. I might have stretched the boundaries with the line you comment on but I think you are going way over the top when you say that's the ordinary for me and some how use it as a point to argue about.

Did you ever consider you just might not have understood it and other more "advanced" (didn't want to use too much of a difficult word there) types might not have had any problem? Any way I'll stop there for now, too many complexities (google if unsure) to figure out, I know.

Speaking personally, I didn't have any problem in understanding the words you used, nor do I struggle with words in isolation, even long ones sometimes.

To paraphrase Eric Morecambe, you used all the right words, just not necessarily in the right order. Sentences need to make sense and yours didn't.

 

[Barney]

Speaking personally, I didn't have any problem in understanding the words you used, nor do I struggle with words in isolation, even long ones sometimes.

To paraphrase Eric Morecambe, you used all the right words, just not necessarily in the right order. Sentences need to make sense and yours didn't.

Which part made it not make sense and why?

 

[Barney]

Trigger Blade Hmm...been viewing the thread for a good few minutes, but no reply. It seems odd to claim you couldn't understand something then not reply when asked which bit was causing the confusion. Perhaps that tells me all I need to know.

 

[Esablade]

Trigger Blade Hmm...been viewing the thread for a good few minutes, but no reply. It seems odd to claim you couldn't understand something then not reply when asked which bit was causing the confusion. Perhaps that tells me all I need to know.

Perhaps he's gone for a crap just as you've been doing, verbally, over these boards?

 

[Barney]

Perhaps he's gone for a crap just as you've been doing, verbally, over these boards?

Back in your box, there's a good lad.

 

[Esablade]

Back in your box, there's a good lad.

Nah..I've come to listen to your comedy genius
Edward Lear's got nowt on you

 

[Trigger Blade]

Trigger Blade Hmm...been viewing the thread for a good few minutes, but no reply. It seems odd to claim you couldn't understand something then not reply when asked which bit was causing the confusion. Perhaps that tells me all I need to know.

I had no idea there was a stalking function. I am however flattered that you replied to my constructive post within a minute and then hung around for a reply for twenty minutes. Apologies for keeping you waiting while I got on with my life.

Perhaps he's gone for a crap just as you've been doing, verbally, over these boards?

Thanks Esa, but I was doing other things, cooking, watching football, PMed somebody on here on an unrelated matter......

2. The continuation of the evidently horrid managerial ability the ruining is driven by will halt and send the club backwards for another 4 years at the very least.

There are so many things wrong with just the first part of that sentence, here's a few for starters:-

* It has no punctuation and it needs at least a comma, although it would still be a lost cause
* How can a continuation of something halt, they're diametric opposites?
* Ability exists, there is no such thing as the continuation of it, evidently horrid or otherwise
* Ruining is not a noun, it's a present participle, it always helps to use real words

I've read it a few times and I still don't understand the specific point you're trying to make. What is it that will halt? And why would whatever it is that halts send the club backwards for at least four years?

I'm not expecting to dent your self-confidence, or make you think that I (and others who were similarly confused) have a point. It's more likely that you'll tell me I'm wrong and stupid.

 

[Barney]

I had no idea there was a stalking function. I am however flattered that you replied to my constructive post within a minute and then hung around for a reply for twenty minutes. Apologies for keeping you waiting while I got on with my life.



Thanks Esa, but I was doing other things, cooking, watching football, PMed somebody on here on an unrelated matter......



There are so many things wrong with just the first part of that sentence, here's a few for starters:-

* It has no punctuation and it needs at least a comma, although it would still be a lost cause
* How can a continuation of something halt, they're diametric opposites?
* Ability exists, there is no such thing as the continuation of it, evidently horrid or otherwise
* Ruining is not a noun, it's a present participle, it always helps to use real words

I've read it a few times and I still don't understand the specific point you're trying to make. What is it that will halt? And why would whatever it is that halts send the club backwards for at least four years?

I'm not expecting to dent your self-confidence, or make you think that I (and others who were similarly confused) have a point. It's more likely that you'll tell me I'm wrong and stupid.

It doesn't need any commas.

If you read it, it was a continuation of one thing halting another. It wasn't the same thing, never thought I'd have to take the time to even attempt to explain that one.

Poor ability can be continually shown.

It made perfect sense to include ruining where I did, as I state "is driven by" afterwards.

The club will halt. The club will be sent backwards. A combinstion of the two, usually the former first quickly followed by the latter.

Did you get all that? You know what they say, you learn something new every day.

 

[Sean Thornton]

It doesn't need any commas.

If you read it, it was a continuation of one thing halting another. It wasn't the same thing, never thought I'd have to take the time to even attempt to explain that one.

Poor ability can be continually shown.

It made perfect sense to include ruining where I did, as I state "is driven by" afterwards.

The club will halt. The club will be sent backwards. A combinstion of the two, usually the former first quickly followed by the latter.

Did you get all that? You know what they say, you learn something new every day.

Combinstion. Brilliant.

Perfect sense. Even better!

 

[Ricky]

Let's keep this argument going for many hours...

 

[Barney]

Combinstion. Brilliant.

Perfect sense. Even better!

Are we picking up on pressing s instead of a on the old keyboard now? At least I know the rest of it's been taken in if that's the type of thing you're getting at.

 

[Sean Thornton]

Are we picking up on pressing s instead of a on the old keyboard now? At least I know the rest of it's been taken in if that's the type of thing you're getting at.

It's ?

 

[Barney]

It's ?

You're much funnier when you're talking shit about the accounts to try and come across as a bit of a fancy Dan and then admitting you don't have a clue. That was great that. Provided me with a bit of amusement. Can we get back to that?

 

[Sean Thornton]

You're much funnier when you're talking shit about the accounts to try and come across as a bit of a fancy Dan and then admitting you don't have a clue. That was great that. Provided me with a bit of amusement. Can we get back to that?

Yes because I admitted to that. Check the thread, you went missing. What about contract law? Went missing then too. Do you have only one arm?

Don't get all billy big bollocks because your sat on Ricky's knee .

 

[Barney]

Yes because I admitted to that. Check the thread, you went missing. What about contract law? Went missing then too. Do you have only one arm?

Don't get all billy big bollocks because your sat on Ricky's knee .

Come on, tell us about the accounts. You know you want to.

 

[PeteBlade]

You're much funnier when you're talking shit about the accounts to try and come across as a bit of a fancy Dan and then admitting you don't have a clue. That was great that. Provided me with a bit of amusement. Can we get back to that?

By "talking shit about accounts" I can only assume you mean correcting you when you spout absolute shite regarding finances.

 

[Barney]

By "talking shit about accounts" I can only assume you mean correcting you when you spout absolute shite regarding finances.

No, it means talking any old shit you can read from the accounts to try and create a false image as an ITK and a fancy Dan and then eventually admitting he hadn't a clue on one of the most important questions. Priceless.

 

[PeteBlade]

No, it means talking any old shit you can read from the accounts to try and create a false image as an ITK and a fancy Dan and then eventually admitting he hadn't a clue on one of the most important questions. Priceless.

He's never claimed to be ITK.

He just knows more than you about accounts.

 

[Barney]

He's never claimed to be ITK.

He just knows more than you about accounts.

You aren't his accounting assistant are you? It's like watching the two Ronnies.

 

[BornOnShorehamStreet]

You aren't his accounting assistant are you? It's like watching the two Ronnie's.

That'll be "The Two Ronnies", then

 

[Barney]

That'll be "The Two Ronnies", then

No full stop after the "then", then?

 

[BornOnShorehamStreet]

No full stop after the "then", then?

It's in my emoticon's left eye - that's why he's winking!

 

[PeteBlade]

You aren't his accounting assistant are you? It's like watching the two Ronnies.

I've no idea why you feel so threatened by people knowing more about a subject than you do.

 

[Sean Thornton]

I've no idea why you feel so threatened by people knowing more about a subject than you do.

I'd expect it's a daily event. Halting ruination of the backwards driven combustible apparition of s instead of a in a formulaic exceptance of normalcy in the paradigm of Adkins versus retardism.

 

[Barney]

I've no idea why you feel so threatened by people knowing more about a subject than you do.

It's everything to do with talking as if he wants to come across as if he knows more than he does, and then admitting he doesn't know anything about one of the most important parts. He just made himself look a bit daft, that was all.

 

[Sean Thornton]

It's everything to do with talking as if he wants to come across as if he knows more than he does, and then admitting he doesn't know anything about one of the most important parts. He just made himself look a bit daft, that was all.

Post that bit up via the search option.

However if its the bit about no one having an analysis of the admin expenses I said that repeatedly. You decided to leap into the discussion despite knowing nothing whatsoever about the accounts.

As for looking daft, shall we visit your contract claims or even more recently your gobbledegook sentence about horrid, ruining and halting which you laughably defending despite universal opinion that it was meaningless bluster.

 

[Barney]

Post that bit up via the search option.

You what, sorry?

 

[prince albert]

It's everything to do with talking as if he wants to come across as if he knows more than he does, and then admitting he doesn't know anything about one of the most important parts. He just made himself look a bit daft, that was all.

it's not something you've ever done is it.

 

[Cyprus Blade]

Can someone tell me what this thread is about ? From the little I have read its petty playground stuff again wrecking another thread. Was that the objective? No way am I reading 6 pages of it.

Get a room or create a "have a barney with Barney" thread.

Please.