Pintor75
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2023
- Messages
- 2,342
- Reaction score
- 2,377
Tom, sorry, thought he was on loanDavies?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Tom, sorry, thought he was on loanDavies?
Choudary has been great last couple of games but Vini is a different level entirelyWill Vini get back in?
God no another underwhelming typical United style signingI think we definitely need to sign him if we go up . The amount of times our midfield went missing last season was frightening and just allowed teams to basically attack at will . Hopefully having a player like this would stop some of that . Being realistic we are not going to play teams off the park , we don’t do that now , but it will hopefully make us harder to beat .
As ever UTB !
fuck me what a racist cnunt he is
Leicester rag suggesting he's staying at Leicester. But also states (as this thread title) that there's an option to buy. So i'd say United hold the cards, not Choudhury?!?!
View attachment 212180
And there in a nutshell is the problem with the Premier league, totally overpaying decent and average players.We have an option, but the wages are apparently unaffordable whilst we're in the Championship.
As with BBD, I think the options were only ever realistic if we went up.
Shame, as I'd have really liked to have had Choudhury back. Good player.
Would make no sense for Leicester to strengthen a promotion rival.Why cant we just loan him again ? We did with Henderson. Depends what Leicester and the player wants to do but its an option.
Sadly I can’t see us going for Souttar. I’m fairly sure he’s out until January then it depends how well he recoversWould be an excellent signing, wages permitting,I'm and Souttar, just as long as we don't go for Thomas, Westergaard and the awful Faes![]()
Does it matter if they don't want them? We do.One reason I'd be against signing Souttar and Choudhury on permanent deals is that we'd be giving Leicester a large chunk of money for unwanted players which will help them sign more players. You don't help your rivals.
Does it matter if they don't want them? We do.
Yep - We sold Bogle to a rival and used the money wisely nearlyOne reason I'd be against signing Souttar and Choudhury on permanent deals is that we'd be giving Leicester a large chunk of money for unwanted players which will help them sign more players. You don't help your rivals.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?