Kevincarterversion2.0
Active Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2015
- Messages
- 1,742
- Reaction score
- 2,243
Without Jack Robinson.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
In terms of the current squad, it feels that it is the easiest to arrive at with minimal recruitment already.3-1-4-2 is the way to go
Totally agree. You could even utter the immortal words 'Muttley do something'.If we score 1, go for 2.
If we score 2, try for a 3rd.
Dont even think about "sitting in" until we are at least 3 up.
If for some reason we aren't fit enough to do this, then do something about it!
And when it dosen't work, "Drat, Drat and Double Drat"Totally agree. You could even utter the immortal words 'Muttley do something'.
In terms of the current squad, it feels that it is the easiest to arrive at with minimal recruitment already.
Cooper
Dunne Anel Robinson
Souza
Seriki Arblaster Davies Burrows
Campbell Moore
Given Dunne’s experience of both central defence and right back he’d be ideal for right centre back. Anel was surprisingly good as the central figure when he played there.
Seriki and Burrows would have no issue as wingbacks.
Souza a given but I put Tom Davies then next to Arblaster (assuming Hamer is off). If fit I don’t see how you leave him out.
We look better with two forwards even if one is a number 10.
I had no issue with 4-4-2 but were a bit light on wingers. Unlike the OP I wasn’t a big fan of inverted wingers as a Plan A. No issue as an alternative tactic. Rather put crosses in to a 6’6” striker and watch the mayhem ensue. 4-2-3-1 is not far off only worh more of an attacking midfielder rather than additional striker.
I don’t dislike 4-3-3 but I just don’t see us as a one striker club at present. I’m not sure we have anyone who excels at that role and is a goal threat. You need a Drogba type. Had we got promoted this would have felt an obvious transition.
That team would show that the owners aren’t serious about a promotion push.In terms of the current squad, it feels that it is the easiest to arrive at with minimal recruitment already.
Cooper
Dunne Anel Robinson
Souza
Seriki Arblaster Davies Burrows
Campbell Moore
Given Dunne’s experience of both central defence and right back he’d be ideal for right centre back. Anel was surprisingly good as the central figure when he played there.
Seriki and Burrows would have no issue as wingbacks.
Souza a given but I put Tom Davies then next to Arblaster (assuming Hamer is off). If fit I don’t see how you leave him out.
We look better with two forwards even if one is a number 10.
I had no issue with 4-4-2 but were a bit light on wingers. Unlike the OP I wasn’t a big fan of inverted wingers as a Plan A. No issue as an alternative tactic. Rather put crosses in to a 6’6” striker and watch the mayhem ensue. 4-2-3-1 is not far off only worh more of an attacking midfielder rather than additional striker.
I don’t dislike 4-3-3 but I just don’t see us as a one striker club at present. I’m not sure we have anyone who excels at that role and is a goal threat. You need a Drogba type. Had we got promoted this would have felt an obvious transition.
Agree with your points however since Souttar's injury i think we've looked a lot more fragile at the back. Absolute waste of time bringing Holding in, and when he did play he played assured and calm but then in the next game was dropped i just didn't get it. CB's massive target for recruitment. Think we need 2, 2 Centre mids, a couple of wingers with pace and another striker.I think defensively we are OK
We were stronger defensively with Souttar in the team, undoubtedly. Without him we were weaker. But even without him, when you look statistically at the basic numbers (not a deep dive) we achieved 3rd best goals conceded record in the league and our goals for record is the 6th best. To me this suggests that as a real basic overview the attacking play is whats holding back from our potential.Agree with your points however since Souttar's injury i think we've looked a lot more fragile at the back. Absolute waste of time bringing Holding in, and when he did play he played assured and calm but then in the next game was dropped i just didn't get it. CB's massive target for recruitment. Think we need 2, 2 Centre mids, a couple of wingers with pace and another striker.
Good shout, it would remove our need for wingers, we've only got 1 winger (Brooks) even if he is an inverted winger, but he can play midfield as well.In terms of the current squad, it feels that it is the easiest to arrive at with minimal recruitment already.
Cooper
Dunne Anel Robinson
Souza
Seriki Arblaster Davies Burrows
Campbell Moore
Given Dunne’s experience of both central defence and right back he’d be ideal for right centre back. Anel was surprisingly good as the central figure when he played there.
Seriki and Burrows would have no issue as wingbacks.
Souza a given but I put Tom Davies then next to Arblaster (assuming Hamer is off). If fit I don’t see how you leave him out.
We look better with two forwards even if one is a number 10.
I had no issue with 4-4-2 but were a bit light on wingers. Unlike the OP I wasn’t a big fan of inverted wingers as a Plan A. No issue as an alternative tactic. Rather put crosses in to a 6’6” striker and watch the mayhem ensue. 4-2-3-1 is not far off only worh more of an attacking midfielder rather than additional striker.
I don’t dislike 4-3-3 but I just don’t see us as a one striker club at present. I’m not sure we have anyone who excels at that role and is a goal threat. You need a Drogba type. Had we got promoted this would have felt an obvious transition.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?