Outgoing? Hamer

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Absolutely but it won’t be the first time it’s happened. My understanding is they’ve made a payment to buy the club (or payments) not paid in full?

I believe the consortium thought we were going up and made the gamble that the Cannon signing would act as insurance to achieve that. If they’ve borrowed the money for Cannon that’s the first red flag for me.

I’m not yet convinced by these owners and you can call it as some would on here, bed wetting or flouncing, it doesn’t matter.

I hope I’m wrong but let’s just say time will tell
You are not flouncing at all. Bedwetting, definitely.
 

Regardless you've completely missed the point I was making, which isn't the first time.

My point in brief is that Wilder's system was based on results and winning, Selles appears to be about maximising each players individual strengths and allowing them to shine by letting them play their natural game within a system.
Perhaps if all your points weren't smeared with jabs at Wilder they'd be more agreeable.
 
Are you suggesting they have only paid the Prince a first installment?

No not really.

I’m suggesting as with a lot of these contractual agreements, it’s based on payments and not necessarily £105m up front. Whether that amounts to a payment or a number of payments after 8 months I’ve no idea.
 
No not really.

I’m suggesting as with a lot of these contractual agreements, it’s based on payments and not necessarily £105m up front. Whether that amounts to a payment or a number of payments after 8 months I’ve no idea.

They went through loads of testing by the EFL. They had to prove they could fund and sustain us.
 
Are you suggesting they have only paid the Prince a first installment?
Not sure how much of the debt they have paid but it's unlikely to be all. The prince still has a charge registered on the assets of the club. That charge is only satisfied when he's paid in full. The charge is still outstanding and still registered at Companies House.
 
No not really.

I’m suggesting as with a lot of these contractual agreements, it’s based on payments and not necessarily £105m up front. Whether that amounts to a payment or a number of payments after 8 months I’ve no idea.
I'll let one of our business gurus iron this out 😄
 
No not really.

I’m suggesting as with a lot of these contractual agreements, it’s based on payments and not necessarily £105m up front. Whether that amounts to a payment or a number of payments after 8 months I’ve no idea.
You’ve eluded to inside knowledge in the past. Are these worrying assertions based on anything solid or speculative we could be treading in the steps of our neighbours.?

Dangerous territory.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom