Grecian2000
Borderline mentalist.
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 7,744
- Reaction score
- 8,963
We've got some posters who despite spending their lifetime slagging off some of our players, still claim it's bad business when we sell them.
Indeed.
I don't think Pinchy will be along anytime soon to suggest we should have squeezed out a few dollars from our Aussie heroes for taking his nemesis though!
I always find these debates slightly difficult. It matters not a jot to me what happens to a players career once he's left the Lane. He might do a Lee Morris or a Kyle Walker, but there's nothing to say the same would have happened if they'd stayed put. To me a decision is judged on how it affected our team rather than what that player became afterwards. For instance, Brian Deane is not thought of in the same regard anywhere other than BDTBL but his leaving (twice) had severe detrimental affects on the team so can be judged as catastrophic (especially getting relegated the season after that first sale).
We might not a have "given players away" based on their subsequent efforts but the drip, drip effect of team weakening has resulted in years of regression.