HighfieldBlade
Well-Known Member
With any luck, Chesterfield will be down already before the game starts. I hope Ched is 'rested'. If he played, at best it would divert attention from our own celebrations, at worst the atmosphere could get toxic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Had we not been top of the leauge , some peoples opinions would have been very different .
What does that even mean? Do you believe he was worth what it cost the club, both in monetary terms and reputation?Had we not been top of the leauge , some peoples opinions would have been very different .
When Southend beat us 3v0 at home Chesterfield played Walsall same night ,Winning 2v0 Ched scored both , late on , as news filtered thru a Super Ched Evans Chant went up from the kop , this is before he was found innocent as well . Its great we are top but we easily forget what the feeling was back then .that wouldn't change the fact he's done practically nothing for chesterfield would it?
So you can only impact on something if you act illegally? What about unprofessionally, you know as a professional footballer representing our club and fans?FMBlade1 is right though. Ched legally did nothing wrong. Therefore 'he' didn't derail anything, it was the wrongful decision in the first instance that did that. Whether that comes down to the lack of the extra evidence or whatever.
The feeling was wrong, those chanting his name were wrong, and they all damaged our club with those thoughts, feelings and actions.When Southend beat us 3v0 at home Chesterfield played Walsall same night ,Winning 2v0 Ched scored both , late on , as news filtered thru a Super Ched Evans Chant went up from the kop , this is before he was found innocent as well . Its great we are top but we easily forget what the feeling was back then .
The impact on our season came about as a result of a decision that was wrongful and not his fault.So you can only impact on something if you act illegally? What about unprofessionally, you know as a professional footballer representing our club and fans?
His actions, and the consequences of those actions, affected our club in a hugely negative way, and utilmatrly derailed our season. It's quite simple really.
He cost us a fortune and delivered very little against it to justify that cost, do you think he should be considered a hero?
He was found guilty by a fair process. His trail wasn't corrupt or biased and there was significant reason for a jury to find him guilty so that decision wasn't found to be wrong based on the evidence provided. He wasn't setup, he wasn't framed, he was put on trail, based in large part, on his own words during his interview for fucks sake. An interview he decided to have without legal council by the way, another unprofessional decision.The impact on our season came about as a result of a decision that was wrongful and not his fault.
His actions would have had no impact on our season whatsoever were it not for said wrongful decision.
Of course it was. It's not like he had to settle for the defence provided on his behalf. He picked out his legal team at great expense I'd imagine. He had a 100% fair trail, there is no possible argument against that fact.The process wasn't fair, his legal team failed to collect all the necessary evidence before the first trial which may well have led to a not guilty verdict first time round.
If I got wrongly jailed for speeding in a 60 zone yet I only did 59 which negatively affected the company I work for am I responsible for that?
He made mistakes, he is responsible for those.So Evans is now to blame for his legal team making mistakes? It wasn't fair he got convicted because all the available evidence was not used in his first trial as a result of his mistakes.
I am responsible for being wrongly convicted having drove at 59 miles an hour?
The system failed Evans, and us it really is as simple as that.
Since he signed for Chezzy, eyes have been on the two fixtures against them
The last time he was on the Bramall Lane pitch he scored a late goal to put United 3-1 up and all but secure us a place in the Championship.
Five years and two weeks later, he'll be back and it's highly likely that it will be a party for the home fans whilst the away team will be sunk to the fourth tier.
Is he likely to be mobbed and put in a Blades shirt or will he want to escape down the tunnel quickly?
Either way, it'll be an odd day for Ched Evans.
Mobbed and a blades shirt put on him?
Are you for real?
Not even on porktalk would you find a ridiculous comment like that.
But if it hadn't been for the wrongful conviction, those actions wouldn't have jeopardised the club.He was found guilty by a fair process. His trail wasn't corrupt or biased and there was significant reason for a jury to find him guilty so that decision wasn't found to be wrong based on the evidence provided. He wasn't setup, he wasn't framed, he was put on trail, based in large part, on his own words during his interview for fucks sake. An interview he decided to have without legal council by the way, another unprofessional decision.
He was 100% responsible for his actions that night which were unprofessional and jepidised the club.
His actions caused everything that happened afterwards and he is responsible for that.
If you hire someone to represent you, then you are responsible for picking them, yes, and I couldn't give a shit about him cheating on his girlfriend.So if you pay someone highly for their resources and they mess up its your fault?
So any player that cheats on his girlfriend isn't acting like a professional employee of a football club?
So Evans is responsible for us not getting promoted because he decided (naively I admit) to be honest when interviewed? Him being charged didn't affect us whatsoever, him being WRONGLY convicted was.
You've shown your true colours with your last question as you indicate it was justifiable that he should have been convicted, fair enough that's your prerogative.
For what its worth since you ask I think Evans thought she was able to and was consenting, and had reasonable belief in that conclusion.
But if it hadn't been for the wrongful conviction, those actions wouldn't have jeopardised the club.
As I said - what impacted our season is the wrongful decision on his actions, not his actions themselves.
On his day he could Destroy us , and we all know it .
toe
ffs
If he hadn't been convicted then his actions, and misogynistic decisions would have damaged the clubs. We arent supported by all men, we have a strong female following and the way he behaved isn't how one of our players should act in order to represent us in the most positive manner. Football has a misogynitic under belly which needs tackling not enforcing, and a lot what was heard on the terraces during his trial and afterwards was the latter.Evans is responsible for picking them yes, but he isn't responsible for the mistakes that they made.
Please explain how his actions were 'unprofessional'? If he hadn't have been convicted how damaging would it have been to the reputation of the football club?
There was no dig, keep calm and sorry for misjudging your opinion
I would suggest that Evans, under pressure tired and perhaps a little drunk didn't articulate himself as well as he would have liked in his first interview.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?