CONFIRMED Ched Evans officially signs for SUFC

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


He will be a low risk (in terms of wages and fee) signing.

If anyone can get Ched back to his best then surely it has to be CW and his backroom team.

Chill your boots people and get behind them!!
 
ShockingBadBuy said:
Doesn't scan, sorry. It's like something by Ginsberg, or maybe Dylan in the mid-60s, where they just keep cramming as many extra words as they can into really long lines that go on and on forever.

Would be neat if you could get it going, though, as an alternative to "JoC's Hat" :)
Click to expand...

Power spent passion bespoils our soul receiver.

My favourite line by Jon Anderson. No idea what it fuckin' means though.

Back on topic, the big question is, what on earth is COME BACK CHED going to call himself now?
 
S64 Blade said:
She mentions men with cash, which yes, can be a factor in some outcomes. However, she fails to see that he was actually convicted of the offence when had more cash. His wealth didn't help him originally and arguably worked against him, so why the double standards?
Click to expand...

There is no point to trying to find reason behind her thinking. In her mind he was guilty before the case even made it to court.

It's all about men and privilege in her mind. Although really its down to the fact she probably suffered an abusive relationship and has decided every man is guilty regardless.
 
Bladesman said:
Click to expand...


People need to accept that Ched Evans was the unfortunate victim of a miscarriage of justice, he is not a rapist, he was guilty of foolish infidelity, but were that a barr to a career in football, the Premier League would consist of about eight teams!

Saddo Jean Hatchet needs to find a new drum to bang, before she/he finds her/himself stood in the dock! :)
 
S64 Blade said:
She mentions men with cash, which yes, can be a factor in some outcomes. However, she fails to see that he was actually convicted of the offence when had more cash. His wealth didn't help him originally and arguably worked against him, so why the double standards?
Click to expand...
Because most of us couldn't have afforded the appeal?
 
I wasn't expecting an announcement full of exuberant hyperbole, and certainly not from Wilder. Low key on this was surely the obvious response on all fronts, minimise expectations and keep down attention on the club.

Of course, it could also be Wilder sees it as nothing more than a squad signing and nowt to get excited about.
 

S64 Blade said:
But if he was guilty, why would that matter?
Click to expand...
Because in a case like this his 'guilt' could never be established by fact alone, it was always going to be decided by opinion. It's not like a murder where there are five witnesses, CCTV footage and DNA evidence and there's no question of guilt, it was down to whether twelve people thought he was guilty.
By being able to afford really good barristers who were able to convince an appeal court to allow further evidence that some still believe shouldn't have been allowed and convince a second group of twelve people that this 'evidence' was relevant, by casting enough doubt in the minds of the jury and convince this second group of people to disagree with what the first group believed, he was able to get his verdict overturned.

If I had been found guilty, I doubt I could have even afforded to pay for any more legal advice, never mind afford the cost of the appeal process and re-trial that he had to pay for. Whether I was 'guilty' or not. So, in the eyes of the law, I'd have remained guilty.
 
SouthEssexBlade said:
I wasn't expecting an announcement full of exuberant hyperbole, and certainly not from Wilder.
Click to expand...

It's common practice in football and elsewhere for the manager's / boss's comments to originate in the PR department, not from their own mouth. The boss / manager is then asked to OK the comment.
 
BushBlade said:
Because in a case like this his 'guilt' could never be established by fact alone, it was always going to be decided by opinion. It's not like a murder where there are five witnesses, CCTV footage and DNA evidence and there's no question of guilt, it was down to whether twelve people thought he was guilty.
By being able to afford really good barristers who were able to convince an appeal court to allow further evidence that some still believe shouldn't have been allowed and convince a second group of twelve people that this 'evidence' was relevant, by casting enough doubt in the minds of the jury and convince this second group of people to disagree with what the first group believed, he was able to get his verdict overturned.

If I had been found guilty, I doubt I could have even afforded to pay for any more legal advice, never mind afford the cost of the appeal process and re-trial that he had to pay for. Whether I was 'guilty' or not. So, in the eyes of the law, I'd have remained guilty.
Click to expand...
You say by being able to afford really good barristers to allow for further evidence... He was able to do this in the first instance, financially.

Financial resource has been a constant throughout. The evidence hasn't.
 
Good bit of business .

Head down now Ched , get your fitness sorted in the summer and crack on .

Another signing . That's two and I'm more than happy with both .

That is all .
 
S64 Blade said:
You say by being able to afford really good barristers to allow for further evidence... He was able to do this in the first instance, financially.

Financial resource has been a constant throughout. The evidence hasn't.
Click to expand...
I don't really understand your point tbh.
 
S64 Blade said:
The new evidence was the reason for his acquittal, not money.

You can pay for all the retrials in the world and not have the right evidence to prove your innocence.
Click to expand...
It was testimony rather than 'evidence'. It wasn't like they'd just found some footage of the incident and it showed her consenting.

Without the money they wouldn't have been able to afford a barrister good enough to even convince an appeal court to allow it.

I get your point that if nothing had been there at all, no amount of money could (legitatemately) have caused the decision to be overturned but the fact remains that without money there wouldn't have been an appeal.
 
Stupid sympathy signing by McCabe.

Essentially we're signing a striker because he had a 5 month purple patch 6 years ago when he got Lee Bowyer syndrome.
 
McGrath said:
Stupid sympathy signing by McCabe.

Essentially we're signing a striker because he had a 5 month purple patch 6 years ago when he got Lee Bowyer syndrome.
Click to expand...


A little bit unfair to Chris Wilder that .
 

Elated to see Ched return to the club, fantastic signing, I'm sure he'll get the goals in the Championship that we'll need and pleased that Wilder is onside with it (might have had reservations if it was strictly a McCabe signing).

Poor lad has had to live with a lot of shit in the past few years, now thankfully all behind him as it turned out he was an innocent man afterall, as many Blades thought all along.

Welcome home "Super Cheddy Evans ..."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Blades jailbird XI
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
McGrath
M
C
Chris Wilder new contract
5 6 7
Replies
190
Views
7K
NAnstonblade
NAnstonblade
Balham
'Memries' Where are they now? United 0-0 Coventry City (Championship, 20 November 2021)
Replies
7
Views
422
Chilttheblade
Chilttheblade
JayGreen17
How do You Feel Now? What Should the Club Do?
2 3
Replies
72
Views
3K
Nick Jansky
Nick Jansky
Balham
'Memries' Where are they now? United 1-1 Coventry City (FA Cup quarter final replay, 17 March 1998)
Replies
11
Views
798
Pollingtonblade
P

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom