redandwhitewizard
Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2024
- Messages
- 164
- Reaction score
- 391
Don't worry we'll get him back when he's 35, injury prone and legs have gone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Ok so why did we spend loads of money on a load of shit cars/holidays/houses last season when we knew we would be in this financial situation now?When people can no longer afford the lifestyle they once had they might downsize their house , holiday less frequently or not replace the car as often is that asset stripping or simply living within their means ?
The club has a budget , we have rules around expenditure that they try to balance with being competitive and the expectations of supporters and their magic money tree.
Most want a club thats sustainable, to stay within the rules and will be here for generations to come but many want expenditure that risks it.
We cant have it all .
Its a balance we need to strike and do the best we can with what we have .
I honestly think no one at the club properly understood the incoming SCR rules. It would also explain why we panic sold Brooks before the new rules went live (we could book the profit in the current year, whereas under SCR you have to amortise incoming fees over the next 3 years).Ok so why did we spend loads of money on a load of shit cars/holidays/houses last season when we knew we would be in this financial situation now?
If you want balance, buying McGuinness, Matos, Chong and all the AI shite we spunked money on last season feels pretty unbalanced.
Now we’re in a situation where we’re lumbered with the shite car that doesn’t run, the house that’s falling apart and a holiday to Pontins, and we’ve had to sell O’Hare, Brooks and Hamer…
Because you have to take risks in football when it comes to signings. Unless you have the money for guatanteed, proven players - you have to take risks.Ok so why did we spend loads of money on a load of shit cars/holidays/houses last season when we knew we would be in this financial situation now?
If you want balance, buying McGuinness, Matos, Chong and all the AI shite we spunked money on last season feels pretty unbalanced.
Now we’re in a situation where we’re lumbered with the shite car that doesn’t run, the house that’s falling apart and a holiday to Pontins, and we’ve had to sell O’Hare, Brooks and Hamer…
And if his form declines? Or he gets injured?
Have any serious bids come in for them?Sell Burrows? Peck? Seriki?
I’m sure if we’re desperate for cash we’ll find someone to sell
Have any serious bids come in for them?
except we haven't, which is why we rejected the Seriki bid from ItalyI’m sure we could sell anyone if the price is low enough.
Facing a 12 point deduction, not we have a 12 point deduction, how is that confirming things. I do admire the fact though that you must be the only Blade that speaks up on behalf of the American shysters.We aren't facing a deduction - even Wednesdays number 1 fan Simon Jordan has said it's a commercial dispute
I really do wish people would stop banding the deduction around like its some confirmed thing
No, we aren't facing a deduction. Again, it has been thrown about but there's absolutely nothing concrete that we're even being threatened with oneFacing a 12 point deduction, not we have a 12 point deduction, how is that confirming things.
I can guarantee you, I'm not speaking up nor defending them. What I am doing is looking at this logically, with the facts presented to me.I do admire the fact though that you must be the only Blade that speaks up on behalf of the American shysters.
haha
Nah, he'll retire at 33 to become a full time spice boyDon't worry we'll get him back when he's 35, injury prone and legs have gone.
Have we sold O’Hare already or are you just flouncing about something that hasn’t happened yet?
Sponsorships, ownership injections, revenueHaving a very quick look at a transfermarkt.
Wrexham will have spent by the end of this window 40m in euros.
Last season they ended up spending 39m in euros.
This is just fees. That is parachute payment type money being chucked about, without any sales.
I know they have good backers but how are they managing to navigate the spending rules?
Because their income is gargantuan by Champ standards. Sponsors, TV money, owners funding. Financially, they're practically a PL Club.Having a very quick look at a transfermarkt.
Wrexham will have spent by the end of this window 40m in euros.
Last season they ended up spending 39m in euros.
This is just fees. That is parachute payment type money being chucked about, without any sales.
I know they have good backers but how are they managing to navigate the spending rules?
To be fair half our team can barely run so he was already head and shoulders above them..This isn't just sour grapes but i did think he tended to run about in circles quite a bit
he was the only one capable of running for 100 minutes and not made of biscuits. yes he could frustrate, however big loss in my opinion !This isn't just sour grapes but i did think he tended to run about in circles quite a bit
Having a very quick look at a transfermarkt.
Wrexham will have spent by the end of this window 40m in euros.
Last season they ended up spending 39m in euros.
This is just fees. That is parachute payment type money being chucked about, without any sales.
I know they have good backers but how are they managing to navigate the spending rules?
because the club think we are all mongs and believe the hype... we tried, to be fair if they try as hard as the players any wonder we are where we areI just don’t get how we’re still discussing names. Targets should be lined up.
I just don’t get how we’re still discussing names. Targets should be lined up.
haha
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?