Brussels summit to set Blades' transfer pot

[Bladesman]

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sheffield-utd?articleid=2901667


£15mil+ perhaps

Mmmm Nice

Mind you it looks like way may have to lose jags to get the extra £££.

 

[rotherhamblade]

if he does get 15 million to spend there is no reason whatsoever that we shouldnt get rpomoted, sunderland and birmingham had 8 -10 million (i think) .

 

[Bladesman]

I dont think sunderland spent that much.

Alot of players they got on free transfers & loans.

 

[MAQ]

if he does get 15 million to spend there is no reason whatsoever that we shouldnt get rpomoted, sunderland and birmingham had 8 -10 million (i think) .

money isnt the route to the prem. We showed that last season. Didnt really spend loads and we still got there.

And reading are the prime example

 

[rotherhamblade]

money isnt the route to the prem. We showed that last season. Didnt really spend loads and we still got there.

And reading are the prime example

but it helps...

 

[jodman]

It would certainly be a bonus because, unlike Sunderland and Birmingham, our squad doesn't need a major overhaul.

Address the lack of creativity with 2 high quality midfielders and we will be as strong if not stronger then anything else in this division.

 

[MAQ]

but it helps...

cant disagree with you there RB, it doesnt do any harm if your showing that you are willing to spend.

the only problem that i see is the usual. When its publicised what you have, players prices go up, and unlike warnock im not sure that robbo would say

"Fuck off he aint worth that much, were not interested if you want that"

or something to that extent

 

[Greasy Chip Butty]

Its not how much money we have to spend, its how we spend it.


hopefully bryan can use the market well...

unfortunatley he likes the loan market which i don't, no more laughing at the pigs for not having their own players playing.

 

[rotherhamblade]

we MUST not loan to many palyers because if we go up and the contract is up after the season we are ballocksed obvious i know but.

 

[Bladesman]

I wouldnt care if we got the entire Man U reserve team in on loan if it meant promotion.

 

[Linz]

I wouldnt care if we got the entire Man U reserve team in on loan if it meant promotion.

Would that be the Manchester United reserve team that our reserve team beat last season?

 

[Foxy]

Would that be the Manchester United reserve team that our reserve team beat last season?

And quite easily too.

 

[Come from away]

Who cares about the 'team' if it's Richardson we want!

 

[BexleyBlade]

I wouldnt care if we got the entire Man U reserve team in on loan if it meant promotion.

.....to see us return to fizzy pop the following May?

 

[jodman]

.....to see us return to fizzy pop the following May?

Thats quite a leap, too many factors to take into account.

I reckon if we took some of the Man U excess (Richardson, Fletcher and Eagles) we would both win promotion and stay up the following year.

Of course, we have very little chance of getting those player but i think you get my point.

 

[BexleyBlade]

IMO......loans are useless as after a possible 12month spell we would lose them and have to rebuild (hopefully for the prem.) during pre-season giving us too little time

 

[Come from away]

If loan players help get us promoted, why would we worry if they move on, with new cash in hand we can buy what we need.

 

[Greasy Chip Butty]

IMO......loans are useless as after a possible 12month spell we would lose them and have to rebuild (hopefully for the prem.) during pre-season giving us too little time

i don't agree with loans either, if we went up with man u or whoevers players it wouldn't be us going up it'd be a premiership reserve team.

The only positive i can see is probably being in 'pole position' to sign them when sir alex casts them away like half the other youth team players there.

 

[Sensiblade]

Would that be the Manchester United reserve team that our reserve team beat last season?

Twice as well