Gone Elsewhere Billy Sharp

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

MobileBlade said:
My understanding is the fee would have to be offset against the length of the contract so the SCMP would still be in affect. Agents fees do come into play as well.
Click to expand...

I can't find anything to corroborate that.
 



MobileBlade said:
It may be over the weekend sometime but I have at home the detail of what makes up what can be classed as revenue and what costs are included for the 60%. I will see if I can find it.
Click to expand...


Cheers, there's very little information on the Football league website, or anywhere else.
 
Highbury_Blade said:
Cheers, there's very little information on the Football league website, or anywhere else.
Click to expand...

I was wrong - signing on fees are included in the year that they are paid. Interesting article here from Carlisle United website in three parts that explains it all in detail.

So the remainder of your players make up the total amount of player wages in the calculation you make? Yes, and they are placed under the ‘Contract Players’ section of the SCMP form. As part of the submission you have to include their contract start and end date, salary, signing on fee, forecasted appearance fees, associated bonus payments and any relocation fees they receive. Other player sections to be considered as part of the overall calculation are non-contract players, loan players and players on month-to-month contracts.

Read more at http://www.carlisleunited.co.uk/news/article/scmpmay2013partthree-804993.aspx#oLI2hkuwCe7ZGUE6.99

I will have a look for the file that I have over the weekend, though
 
MobileBlade said:
I was wrong - signing on fees are included in the year that they are paid. Interesting article here from Carlisle United website in three parts that explains it all in detail.

So the remainder of your players make up the total amount of player wages in the calculation you make? Yes, and they are placed under the ‘Contract Players’ section of the SCMP form. As part of the submission you have to include their contract start and end date, salary, signing on fee, forecasted appearance fees, associated bonus payments and any relocation fees they receive. Other player sections to be considered as part of the overall calculation are non-contract players, loan players and players on month-to-month contracts.

Read more at http://www.carlisleunited.co.uk/news/article/scmpmay2013partthree-804993.aspx#oLI2hkuwCe7ZGUE6.99

I will have a look for the file that I have over the weekend, though
Click to expand...


Ok, so my theory is utter bollocks then :)
 
If we sign another striker in this window it should be one with very good pace, and it would be a bonus if he could play on the wing as well.
 
judge said:
Why dont you stop asking me stupid questions about what i can and cant prove ? You know i cant prove anything but im not the club fucking accountant
I am a fan on a football forum and i dont have to provide evidence to have an opinion so stop asking me to do things you know i cant. just as you cant provide evidence we are not a selling club who are building a squad on the cheap
Click to expand...

Best reply. Ever!
 
Sometimes people just to let those posters who are 'instantly responsive' time to vent their spleen. I admit to being one of these at times but we get jumped on by people and it just escalates!

Think last has always been my motto!
 



According to a kid at work today, he has heard that he is going for a medical at Leeds today along with the young centre half from Chesterfield.
 
judge said:
Bet the fee is well out of our price range
Click to expand...


As I've said many, many times, our ability to sign Billy Sharp was restricted by the league we are in.

He simply hasn't wanted to drop to League One and before people say he'd have jumped at the opportunity as he's a Blade, no, he wouldn't and didn't. This may have changed the longer he wasn't playing and unhappy, but has remained constant for a while now.

In terms of money, Leeds will be at the very least paying up his Southampton contract (they are also supposed to have offered a decent amount as a transfer fee), as he'd have lost substantial "loyalty" payments by asking for a transfer. He didn't want to lose those. He'll have also taken a decent pay cut I'd imagine, as he was on a decent whack at the Saints.
 



Foxy said:
As I've said many, many times, our ability to sign Billy Sharp was restricted by the league we are in.

He simply hasn't wanted to drop to League One and before people say he'd have jumped at the opportunity as he's a Blade, no, he wouldn't and didn't. This may have changed the longer he wasn't playing and unhappy, but has remained constant for a while now.

In terms of money, Leeds will be at the very least paying up his Southampton contract (they are also supposed to have offered a decent amount as a transfer fee), as he'd have lost substantial "loyalty" payments by asking for a transfer. He didn't want to lose those. He'll have also taken a decent pay cut I'd imagine, as he was on a decent whack at the Saints.
Click to expand...

Yeah but where's our ambition ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fjortoft's Aeroplane
Can we reset the " gone elsewhere" tags?
Replies
6
Views
1K
ThatJa
ThatJa
Coolblade
A few observations from the stats (Soton)
Replies
10
Views
565
BangorBlade
BangorBlade
Kozzy_is_my_Dad
Billy Sharp Interview
Replies
11
Views
3K
jt64
jt64
Torrix1889
Incoming? Billy Sharp
2 3
Replies
77
Views
13K
Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn
Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn
mattbianco1
No Tippy Tappy Football: Billy Sharp
Replies
3
Views
1K
Sheffsteel
Sheffsteel

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom