georgebernardshaw
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 15,508
- Reaction score
- 25,909
Thats where his script is written on his socks.
Christ, he must much better eyesight than me then..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Thats where his script is written on his socks.
Don’t trust this man
Or he knows that whatever he says he's on a hiding to nothing from the fans but someone had to face the media and he was chosen to be the lamb to the slaughterYou know when someone doesn't believe what they're saying or are lying - they can't look straight. He does nothing but fidget and look down
The threshold for constructive dismissal is exceptionally high, the definition is something along the lines of 'fundamental breach of contract that leaves the employee with no other choice but to resign'.I am no employment lawyer, but given the apparent desire from the board for a director of football position to be created, and recent comments against this from Chris, maybe his hand was forced?
Is this in effect constructive dismissal, with a mutual agreement and golden goodbye to avoid a later compensation claim?
HH
Players, property? All came from prem money which means it's been reinvestedWhat..to buy the property ? Use his own money..oh forgot..he ain't got any..FFS
Don’t believe that. Wilder personally talked him into coming back to Utd when he left due to “differences of opinion and working practice” so if he’d not become a well paid puppet, he’d have refused?Or he knows that whatever he says he's on a hiding to nothing from the fans but someone had to face the media and he was chosen to be the lamb to the slaughter![]()
Not the boards investment how he alludes toPlayers, property? All came from prem money which means it's been reinvested
So who's then?Not the boards investment how he alludes to
It's not personal investment it's the premier league prize money...I'm sayin the board wouldn't invest otherwiseSo who's then?
Apart from the top 4 clubs who's board would invest personally?It's not personal investment it's the premier league prize money...I'm sayin the board wouldn't invest otherwise
Got a right stare on.
I might be reading to much into this but, when he speaks about PH and bringing through the academy players (I'm all for if they're good enough) but I hope they're not setting us up to sell a joc and replacing him with an academy lad just to save/make money.
Don't know..don't give a fuck about other clubs..What's your point?Apart from the top 4 clubs who's board would invest personally?
If he was such a stand up bloke, he’d have walked. He’s done to us what Wilson did to the pigs. Spunked the cash on tripe and then waited for his P45.Wilder threw his dummy out when it became clear he wasn't as good as he thought he was. Another warnock -type sheffield united fan.
You deserve a Sevilla dressing down for that pun.
I just want to know exactly what’s gone off. Then I’ll cast my judgement. We don’t know what the Prince wants to put in place. We don’t know what demands/assurances etc Wilder made. We don’t know why a compromise couldn’t be reached. There needs to be a detailed presser!
No, Chris is just an employee...but he forgot that.I am no employment lawyer, but given the apparent desire from the board for a director of football position to be created, and recent comments against this from Chris, maybe his hand was forced?
Is this in effect constructive dismissal, with a mutual agreement and golden goodbye to avoid a later compensation claim?
HH
Especially after leaving him spending the money like a 12 year old who has his Dads cash card on the PlayStation . I think the judge would be more astounded that the 50/12 year old was left unsupervised for so long and whether they were negligent in their roles for been so naive in trusting him to do so.The threshold for constructive dismissal is exceptionally high, the definition is something along the lines of 'fundamental breach of contract that leaves the employee with no other choice but to resign'.
Theoretically at least, I reckon there's a small chance you'd able to argue that forcing a DoF onto Wilder without agreement changes his job role and creates a breach of contract as a result of an imposed variation to his contract. From this it'd be an even bigger task to argue that any breach of contract left him with no other option but to resign.
With the huge caveat that I know absolutely nothing about what has actually happened, I suspect the board are far more concerned about the confidentiality clauses and agreed statements as part of the agreement rather than any Employment Tribunal claim.
Leaky roof at Shirecliffe brought it to a head apparently. The fact that the waterproofing wasn’t working was far more important than things not working on the pitch.
Oh, and because the money spent on players was PL money it’s not important because PA didn’t put it in from his 50p jar.
(Not an attack on Wilder who l wish was still here but a comment on the spin put on here by certain people, after the event)
Very important point is this !Build a new training ground.
The straw that broke the camels back! Get the bloody roofer in!Leaky roof at Shirecliffe brought it to a head apparently. The fact that the waterproofing wasn’t working was far more important than things not working on the pitch.
Oh, and because the money spent on players was PL money it’s not important because PA didn’t put it in from his 50p jar.
(Not an attack on Wilder who l wish was still here but a comment on the spin put on here by certain people, after the event)
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?