berger assault goes unpunished

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

blade too long

we go again
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
32,817
Reaction score
40,491
Location
cabo roig spain
Leeds goal came from dispossessing Berge, which they did kicking him 3 times
how did the ref miss that
he saw every touch on leeds players throughout giving fouls for barely any contact

the assault on Berge was far worse than Egans red card
we ve had very poor treatment so far
 



Robbie Savage on BT said it was 2 fouls , , surely VAR should have checked it
they wind matches far enough back to find fault with us
 
which villa bad decision is he on about , theres a few to choose from

They called and said the decision on Egan was wrong and MR would be calling to explain why.

No call from MR yet, and they told Wilder it was wrong too late for us to appeal - according to Wilders post match.
 
Paul Tierney today... enough said really.

I thought he was pretty biased today, very inconsistent decisions. You could see the genuine hate towards him today from Baldock and especially Billy Sharp who said something nasty about the ref when he was out of earshot of him 🤣 .

The Villa ghost goal only amplified my feeling of bias I feel refs have against us. Especially after the big toe scenario. Prepare for a season of "It's the referee show" is all I've got to say.
 
Leeds goal came from dispossessing Berge, which they did kicking him 3 times
how did the ref miss that
he saw every touch on leeds players throughout giving fouls for barely any contact

the assault on Berge was far worse than Egans red card
we ve had very poor treatment so far
I especially liked Phillips getting going down and getting a free kick when big, bad Ben Osbourne brushed his hip, but when the Leeds player smashes into the back of Bash and he goes down then nothing...actually handball against Bash!
 
Leeds goal came from dispossessing Berge, which they did kicking him 3 times
how did the ref miss that
he saw every touch on leeds players throughout giving fouls for barely any contact

the assault on Berge was far worse than Egans red card
we ve had very poor treatment so far
😂
 



Leeds goal came from dispossessing Berge, which they did kicking him 3 times
how did the ref miss that
he saw every touch on leeds players throughout giving fouls for barely any contact

the assault on Berge was far worse than Egans red card
we ve had very poor treatment so far

I said exactly the same on the live game. Would like to see the challenges again as I’ve not watched any replays since the match finished.
Costa is the sort of player that make refs look stupid, he goes down at the slightest touch and it’s an instant free kick. Far worse challenges go unpunished and it’s a joke.
 
Berge's "foul" on 2:22 in the highlights was when Leeds Utd got possession then scored. If Berge had not been hacked at 2/3 times Leeds wouldnt have got the ball. I didnt notice it when watching it but its blatant foul right in front of the ref. That goal should not have stood. Also in the highlights just before that Robinson's miss Ayling has got Billy in a Wrestler move pinning his arms back which should have been a penalty if the ref had spotted it.
 
I wonder whether VAR looked at the foul on Berge in the lead up to their goal? If it didn't, it makes VAR pretty pointless. I'm a bit tired of watching these games on TV and seeing various incidents incorrectly either going punished or unpunished. At least when you're watching the game in the stadium you only find out about dodgy decisions afterwards
 
Excuses, excuses, we’re sounding like Colin.
There’s no agenda but the 50/50 decisions are going against us.
 
It took 15 seconds from the foul on Berge to the goal. It was surely the same phase of play and when you remember how long it took to look at the Villa Park penalty and how long it can take to draw lines and move them about when checking off side decisions, I think one slow motion look at that incident would have been all that was required
 
Probably not the penalty United were given, by those nasty anti-SUFC referees
To my admittedly biased eyes the penalty was pretty blatant. Why did it take four camera angles and over two minutes to confirm it?

Mate of mine is a West Ham fan and he's convinced there's a hierarchy to the PL for VAR decisions. I have to say I'm not sure it's limited to VAR.
 
Theyve literally told him it was a bad decision.
Who have?

To my admittedly biased eyes the penalty was pretty blatant. Why did it take four camera angles and over two minutes to confirm it?

Mate of mine is a West Ham fan and he's convinced there's a hierarchy to the PL for VAR decisions. I have to say I'm not sure it's limited to VAR.
Was it that long? Imagine they checked Burke offside and then had a few looks to see whether Targett should have seen red. As you say, no debate over the penalty itself.
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom