There's a big difference between the 2.
Wilder has a team of mainly upper end league 1 players and was estimated to finish mid table.
He also played a set style where these lower division players suddenly looked good playing in a well oiled team where everyone knew their jobs.
Almost every goal was a well worked team goal, we didn't seem to score many goals out of nothing from individual brilliance.
His reputation was still quite high when he left us, went to a highly rated Middlesboro side, then a highly rated Watford side.
There's no way either of those clubs would take a risk on Hecky.
Hecky had one of the most expensive squads in the league and was one of the favourites for promotion.
He didn't have a set style of play, apart from organise the defence really well when we sat back.
The team often looked disjointed (especially midfield), we'd look good for 15 minutes then really poor playing kick and rush for 15 minutes, all in the same match (explains why Pompey was sometimes critical even when we won). We relied on individual brilliance to score goals.
A valid excuse that Hecky could use regards last season was it was all about the result, never the performance.
So he'd be willing to do anything in order to win, even if it meant putting 10 men behind the ball against a weak team for the last 20 minutes.
It's not what you want to see.....but it did ensure we got the 3 points and in our financial position that's all what mattered.
Regards Berge if he wants to leave...then as long as we do a good deal then think it's best he leaves.
I suppose the main issue is who do we have lined up as replacements for N'Diaye and Berge because this team is currently surprisingly weak.
