GymClassHero
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2018
- Messages
- 1,620
- Reaction score
- 3,093
- Thread starter
- #31
Fair enough, I misinterpreted your post.Yes, but as I said in my post, Currie was rated as one of the very best of his era and there are plenty on here that would tell you Woody was better. That’s without taking into consideration the likes of Badger who was also highly rated.
So, if Currie and Woody were top, top players their modern day equivalents would be the likes of De Bruyne and Mane.
Saying our players are less talented than those two is very different to saying they’re not talented.
My point was that our players do possess talent - not on the individual brilliant Ronaldo-esque scale, but all of them are high quality players. The majority of people make it sound like they're punching above their weight, but that argument can only stand for so long before people have to accept that they are indeed good players that would get into other top sides.
