Torrix1889
A reight Bobby Dazzler
Far be it from me to question CWAK's tactical genius but there were a few things that stood out like a belisha beacon for me last night that had me completely dumbfounded...now don't get me wrong, individual errors apart I don't think we actually played too badly but it I felt West Ham were there for the taking and we completely missed a trick.
For starters and it was mentioned in the lead up to the game by a few pundits/journos that West Hams defence isn't the quickest, in fact it is so slow that old tree trunk legs Billy got in behind them twice in the first 10 minutes.....it has been their achiles heel on a few occasions this season so why did we start with the two slowest strikers at the Club.....?
Leading on from that, if you play Burke for his pace that would have scared the shit out of their defence so they sit deeper, which in turn allows us to play a 10 in Didzy, meaning Lundstram in the holding position and Norwood getting splinters....
Then there's the subs.....finally Norwood comes off and Didzy drops to the 10 but why McBurnie in a game that is crying out for pace? Every West Ham person in the ground thinks, "ah, they're switching to hoofball"....and whilst West Hams defence may be slow, they are fucking huge! As it turned out it was McBurnie who ended up playing the 10 more than Didzy which left me scratching my head even more.....????......
Then Egan picks up his injury, (fingers crossed it looked worse than it was) and he brings Jags on with 15 minutes left when we are chasing the game at 2 nil down......why? Bang on another striker, switch to a flat back 4 and give it a go....nowt to lose.....another head scratcher???
In my opinion CWAK got it totally wrong last night and should be held solely accountable for the loss. Yes we made individual, (read Norwood) errors but if they had got the side right from the start and made better subs, we may have stood a better chance....
For starters and it was mentioned in the lead up to the game by a few pundits/journos that West Hams defence isn't the quickest, in fact it is so slow that old tree trunk legs Billy got in behind them twice in the first 10 minutes.....it has been their achiles heel on a few occasions this season so why did we start with the two slowest strikers at the Club.....?
Leading on from that, if you play Burke for his pace that would have scared the shit out of their defence so they sit deeper, which in turn allows us to play a 10 in Didzy, meaning Lundstram in the holding position and Norwood getting splinters....
Then there's the subs.....finally Norwood comes off and Didzy drops to the 10 but why McBurnie in a game that is crying out for pace? Every West Ham person in the ground thinks, "ah, they're switching to hoofball"....and whilst West Hams defence may be slow, they are fucking huge! As it turned out it was McBurnie who ended up playing the 10 more than Didzy which left me scratching my head even more.....????......
Then Egan picks up his injury, (fingers crossed it looked worse than it was) and he brings Jags on with 15 minutes left when we are chasing the game at 2 nil down......why? Bang on another striker, switch to a flat back 4 and give it a go....nowt to lose.....another head scratcher???
In my opinion CWAK got it totally wrong last night and should be held solely accountable for the loss. Yes we made individual, (read Norwood) errors but if they had got the side right from the start and made better subs, we may have stood a better chance....