23/24 season kit thread

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Other alternate jersey concepts
 

Attachments

  • 6109DDE6-A8C5-48E7-AF88-CCDEFAC695CD.jpeg
    6109DDE6-A8C5-48E7-AF88-CCDEFAC695CD.jpeg
    66 KB · Views: 14
  • C8F84EA8-0023-46AB-8A33-44138CF7344B.jpeg
    C8F84EA8-0023-46AB-8A33-44138CF7344B.jpeg
    70.6 KB · Views: 13
  • 25B0FDB5-68C8-4013-87E6-CF482C23A9DE.jpeg
    25B0FDB5-68C8-4013-87E6-CF482C23A9DE.jpeg
    106.4 KB · Views: 13

I hate that colour and design. Reminds me of an old mate when we called to pick him up on our Lambretta to go to Skeggy. He had overslept and dashed downstairs in his yellow pants to open door. When he turned to rush back upstairs to get dressed he had a huge brown skid mark up the back. Scarred me for life that sight.
"Like a Battenburg... yellow at the front, brown at the back."

(I know Battenburg is pink and yellow, but this is a quote from Aunt Nesta in Man Down)
 
Reckon new home kit will be obv. usual red white and black etc. Be nice if there was some classy design touch to it as well.

Away kit I'd be up for us going full mad 90s style. A crazy pattern etc.
 
I know we’re talking mostly about design here but the PL relegation shirt is probably the worst quality football shirt I’ve ever owned. It’s up there with a Barca fake I got when I was 11 years old on holiday. It genuinely put me off buying another Blades shirt.
I liked the shirt but sizing was mental. Got a medium which was skin tight so sized up and the large was like a tent
 
I disagree. I think the front of the shirt is absolutely fine. If the back had stripes, it wouldn't have got the stick it did:
View attachment 162295View attachment 162296

The back being plain white puts lots off. If Adidas insisted on a solid back, it should be red, not white.

However, with the design of that shirt having solid shoulders and sleeves, the back had to match the sleeves, otherwise it would have looked out of place.

Solid back...
Official white versus red back:
View attachment 162297View attachment 162298

To go solid red, they would have had to go red shoulders as a minimum, maybe sleeves too.

Red Shoulders:
View attachment 162300View attachment 162299

Shoulders AND Sleeves:
View attachment 162301View attachment 162302

Each to their own obviously, but IMO, white shoulders and sleeves look much better on that shirt than red.
It's the lack of back stripes that cost it for me.
Each to their own indeed, I much prefer that bottom mockup to the monstrosity we actually wore. I'd probably have bought that one.
 
I disagree. I think the front of the shirt is absolutely fine. If the back had stripes, it wouldn't have got the stick it did:
View attachment 162295View attachment 162296

The back being plain white puts lots off. If Adidas insisted on a solid back, it should be red, not white.

However, with the design of that shirt having solid shoulders and sleeves, the back had to match the sleeves, otherwise it would have looked out of place.

Solid back...
Official white versus red back:
View attachment 162297View attachment 162298

To go solid red, they would have had to go red shoulders as a minimum, maybe sleeves too.

Red Shoulders:
View attachment 162300View attachment 162299

Shoulders AND Sleeves:
View attachment 162301View attachment 162302

Each to their own obviously, but IMO, white shoulders and sleeves look much better on that shirt than red.
It's the lack of back stripes that cost it for me.
The problem is that template is awful. Nike are using a very similar one now - see Inter Milan. The way the material is cut and sewn below the collar is both unnecessary and makes any shirt that isn’t a plain colour very difficult to work with, design wise.

Loved the pixelated design of the stripes - and they highlight how that there is plenty of scope to do different things with striped shirts - but on the whole it’s a bad shirt.

On top of that any shirt without stripes on the back is automatically doomed to the average at best category.

Be interesting to see if we keep the stripes on the back this season. There is no reason whatsoever to not have them. No rules, nothing. The club made a point of the last shirt possibly having stripes on the back for the last time due to potential EFL rule changes. Not sure if that rule change has happened but it doesn’t concern us - for now at least. Newcastle - a team in Europe - have released there’s and it’s striped on the back. They will have blocked numbers on the back for the CL games so even then it’s not a difficult workaround.
 
OK it's not 2023, but wow. This is the standard we should be looking for. This is a memorial shirt, granted, but if we're having a third shirt we need something 'different'. Not just the same Owd tried and tested and boring block colours.

Screenshot_20230614_144556.jpg
 

Careful what you wish for.

Short Sleeved £65.
Long Sleeved £72.

Then there's the news announcement 🤣
Looking at the piggies' latest offering I find myself wondering, "Isn't that just the same as last years? And the year before? And the one before that?!" In fact, my perception of that lot is that their shirts hardly vary at all year on year. Same boring template it seems, same width stripes, same sleeves - same shit different season! 🤣
Ours seem to vary much more - Different width stripes, solid sleeves / shoulders, plain backs, stripey backs, black pinstripes sometimes.
Personally I'm glad about that.
Should we be applauded for trying different stuff season to season?
I think so.
 
Last edited:

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom