£17.5M profit last year.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Flatulent_Bob

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
15,802
Reaction score
22,577
Decent profit considering Covid but I’ll leave it to the experts to explain in superior detail. Obviously a lot of those gains will have continued this year, you would suspect and drop off a cliff next.

Key points.
  • Only second profit in over a decade.
  • Turnover £116.8M - up from £8.3 in the Championship, mainly due to broadcasting deals.
  • Sponsorship up nearly 5 times. £2.9M to £14.8M
  • Figures for buying out McCabe included in these figures. Totalled £38M and covered via a mortgage.
 
Last edited:



They've got it out before Companies House 😆. Bin leaked annit
 
Sheffield United posted a profit of £17.5 million in their first year back as a Premier League club despite extensive losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The surplus is only the second posted by the south Yorkshire club in more than a decade, which underlines the value of Premier League football.

The club’s financial accounts for 2019-20 revealed that their turnover shot up to £143.1 million from £20.8 million in 2018-19 following promotion to the top flight. The 2019-20 turnover represents a record high for the club.

What are the significant figures?​

Much of the increased turnover came from broadcasting revenue, which saw the Yorkshire club receive £116.8 million in the year to July 31, 2020 (up from £8.3 million the previous financial year).

Sponsorship also rose sharply to £14.8 million from £2.9 million, while staff wages soared to £77.9 million (up from £40.7 million the previous year, a figure that included promotion bonuses).

How did the club manage to post a profit?​

United served notice in February that their accounting period had been nudged back from the usual June 30 year end to July 31, 2020.

This meant the figures covered the entire extended top flight season, which did not finish until July 26. It also ensured the buyback of Bramall Lane, the club’s Shirecliffe training ground and other properties belonging to previous owner Kevin McCabe were included in the 2019-20 figures.

What else did the accounts reveal?​

The accounts for Sheffield United Football Club, part of the Blades Leisure Limited group, reveal £38 million was spent buying back those properties as part of the High Court ownership case settled in Prince Abdullah’s favour during September, 2019.

These included Bramall Lane and Shirecliffe, along with a development centre on Crookes Road in the city, plus the hotel and serviced office centre that sit adjacent to the stadium. The Court set a deadline of last July to complete the deal.

A mortgage is understood to have been taken out to cover the outlay.

How did COVID-19 impact the club’s finances?​

Projected turnover for the first season back in the top flight had been £155 million but losses attributable to COVID-19 — including both broadcasting rebates and lost ticket revenue — brought that figure down substantially.

According to the newly released accounts, this reduction was made up of £8.7 million (lost broadcast income), £2.5 million (lost revenue) and £467,171 (increased costs) after the season was, first, delayed and then completed behind closed doors.

How does this compare to previous years?​

United’s only previous profit in the past decade came in 2013-14, the year Prince Abdullah joined forces with McCabe as joint owners. But that was largely down to McCabe writing off a substantial loan before going into partnership with the Saudi businessman.

Otherwise, the release of the annual balance sheet each year has brought a sharp intake of breath with United losing £21.3 million last year.

In 2017-18, United’s accounts showed a £2 million loss — though only thanks to an £8.4 million in players sales, believed to be substantial sell-on clauses in the deals that saw Kyle Walker and Harry Maguire leave south Yorkshire for the Premier League.
 
Prince isn't a villain afterall then. That looks like we are healthy.

Although it means we will definitely be selling some players in July to stop that 17.5m being turned into a loss next year.
 
It’s hardly a surprise that with higher revenue and a relatively low wage bill we have turned a profit.

I’d expect the same but probably a lower profit/small loss for this financial year given the additional wages and amortisation with a smaller revenue (full season impact of covid compared to 1/3 season previous year).

Then everything going tits up from next year if we don’t move players on when revenue drops massively, albeit wages should as well.
 



Im a bit confused - why wouldnt we have made a profit - especially our first premier league season? I'd have been stunned if we didnt.

Also, with assets bought as a mortgage/ loan (please correct me if im wrong) the full cost of that isn't included here?
Or is it included as 38 million in the books at once but we're paying it over more years? But then if its included all at once, why do we take a mortgage. Accountancy hurts my brain 🤯
 



Probably shouldn't have bothered but professional pride...couldn't let it lie.

Im a bit confused - why wouldnt we have made a profit - especially our first premier league season? I'd have been stunned if we didnt.

Also, with assets bought as a mortgage/ loan (please correct me if im wrong) the full cost of that isn't included here?
Or is it included as 38 million in the books at once but we're paying it over more years? But then if its included all at once, why do we take a mortgage. Accountancy hurts my brain 🤯

We'd recognise the depreciation charge on the stadium etc (probably over 40 years - I'd need to see the accounts to be sure) but that's about it. Cashflow is a different matter but that's covered elsewhere in the accounts. Same goes for the transfer fees - the whole £17m for McBurnie, for instance, won't be in the accounts: just the first 25% given he signed a four year deal.

As derekacorah says: our P&L costs have been hugely increased for the next few years given the transfer outlay. Cashflow should be OK though.
 
Will parachute payments cover that extortionate wage bill next season?
 
Im a bit confused - why wouldnt we have made a profit - especially our first premier league season? Id have been stunned if we didnt.
Also, with assets bought as a mortgage/ loan (please correct me if im wrong) the full cost of that isn't included here?
Or is it included as 38 million in the books at once but we're paying it over more years? But then if its included all at once, why do we take a mortgage. Accountancy hurts my brain 🤯
The mortgage goes on the balance sheet as a long term liability (anything due after 1 year).

The P&L shows just the annual costs of the loan (interest).

The cash flow statement will show the full cash outgoings.

The only bit impacting on the profitability is the interest charge.
 
The mortgage goes on the balance sheet as a long term liability (anything due after 1 year).

The P&L shows just the annual costs of the loan (interest).

The cash flow statement will show the full cash outgoings.

The only bit impacting on the profitability is the interest charge.

Ok. So 17 million profit, but thats not including the 38 million liability to the club?

Just seen your reply too Balham Blade , thanks for taking the time.
 
The mortgage goes on the balance sheet as a long term liability (anything due after 1 year).

The P&L shows just the annual costs of the loan (interest).

The cash flow statement will show the full cash outgoings.

The only bit impacting on the profitability is the interest charge.
And depreciation :)
 
Ok. So 17 million profit, but thats not including the 38 million liability to the club?
That’s right, but if Abdullah had paid £38m of his own money we’d have had a liability to him on the balance sheet and probably have been paying him market value interest as well so it’s not a massive issue. We’d have owed someone either way.

The difference being that at some point in the future he could decide to convert to shares and write off the debt.
 
Am I right in thinking.... we got Premiership TV moneh and the Prince paid some of that to McCabe to buy himself an asset?

This cannot be allowed? Can it?
 
And depreciation :)
That’s not specific to the mortgage though, that’s just a cost of owning the asset. If we didn’t own the real estate we’d have been paying rent on it so it’s 6 & 2 3’s in my view. Probably a lower cost the way we’ve done it as rent would probably have been higher than depreciation.
 



Will parachute payments cover that extortionate wage bill next season?

I would expect us to have paid some hefty bonuses for staying up last season. That plus wage drops on relegation should see the wagebill drop by 40-50% next year so given we're due 55% of the TV payments - about £55m - we should be OK next season. It'll get squeaky if we don't come back up in the next two seasons.

Educating Twitter will probably lead to you taking sharp objects to your body.
I blame the BBNo Double IPAs. 8.0% of Twitter baiting goodness
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom