Adkins Waffle - post Scunny

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Sorry prick but it is your job to explain to the fans why you make substitutions ,we pay a lot of money to see you and your embarrassment of a team 'perform' and we want to know the reasons they are shit and even shitter after your inspirational half time team talks. Maybe Hammond fell asleep ,during one of your poems ,as we always always come out after half time half asleep.
You've been drinking haven't you? :)
 

No he said it was a hot day so it meant they couldn't play fast football.
Didn't go, first home game I've chosen not to go to in 59 years :(

What I don't understand was it only hot for our players? Was hoping for rain ( bet he's just planted his bedding plants out).
 
Surely any player with a contract is safe? No other club would be stupid enough to buy any of them.

UTB

Cloughie_1885565a.jpg


Hopefully this bloke will be stupid enough, he has form for it after all.
 
This 'moaning' business needs to be put into some kind of perspective. Over 90 years since we last won a major trophy. Many Blades have been born, lived and died in those 90 years. He's been here less than 12 months and wants to have a go at the most patient set of fans he'll ever come across. Disgraceful.

Footnote : I hope as many as possible turn up next Saturday to support the youngsters.
 
Sorry prick but it is your job to explain to the fans why you make substitutions.

Was it not obvious to you why Hammond was subbed? He was playing shite, gifted Scunny a goal and the fans were on his back. I don't see why Adkins needs to publicly slag off a player especially on the last game of the season. Think the interviewer was being a bit of a cock trying to get Adkins to criticise a player to be honest.
 
Was it not obvious to you why Hammond was subbed? He was playing shite, gifted Scunny a goal and the fans were on his back. I don't see why Adkins needs to publicly slag off a player especially on the last game of the season. Think the interviewer was being a bit of a cock trying to get Adkins to criticise a player to be honest.
I don't think it's being a cock to ask a manager the reasons behind his actions. That's the job of the interviewer. If anything the interviewers at RS aren't tough enough and don't ask difficult enough questions. They just tend to stick with ones that are easy to waffle to, as we have seen in the answers throughout the season.
 
I don't think it's being a cock to ask a manager the reasons behind his actions. That's the job of the interviewer. If anything the interviewers at RS aren't tough enough and don't ask difficult enough questions. They just tend to stick with ones that are easy to waffle to, as we have seen in the answers throughout the season.

Interviewers ask about substituations with a view to upcoming games, such as coming off injured. It was obvious Hammond was subbed cause he was playing bad, Stevie Wonder could see that. If he wasn't after a reaction why only ask about the Hammond substituation and not the other two?
 
Was it not obvious to you why Hammond was subbed? He was playing shite, gifted Scunny a goal and the fans were on his back. I don't see why Adkins needs to publicly slag off a player especially on the last game of the season. Think the interviewer was being a bit of a cock trying to get Adkins to criticise a player to be honest.
Then he should lie, say he was carrying a knock or (as it was hot apparently) thought he should bring on fresh legs, give a youngster a go etc. then you ain't having a go at your player in public.
 
Had another listen now im calmer...............we were hoping for rain to play fast football?!?....................he needs to be painting skirtings in his wifes old flat bcos he is a prized plum.
Your time has come,thanks for your effort at this club we love but your not quite"us"
 
Hammond was brought off so he wouldn't have to endure the response of the crowd if he was hooked later. Teachers pet Springs to mind. He wouldn't discuss it because he won't be openly critical of his senior pros, he only does this to the young lads. He's got to go

Which young lad and when has Adkins publicly criticised? Think you're getting your Nigels mixed up.
 

Agreed, though I can just about forgive him here, just after the game.

Within the next week he needs to do a straight talking interview. Accepting that we've been and are gash, that lots of the players are not good enough, and pointing out what he's going to do about it.

UTB
There's a lot of points here about Adkins not blaming the players and saying I know they're crap etc. But you can flip that also in his favour. He didn't come out with the line "this isn't my squad" like many a manager do in this situation. He does need a better interview soon though, but I doubt we'll get it, what with the timing at the end of season. I'm still a little in shock after that interview! I wish he hadn't come out and said what he said!
 
Then he should lie, say he was carrying a knock or (as it was hot apparently) thought he should bring on fresh legs, give a youngster a go etc. then you ain't having a go at your player in public.

Then everyone would say he has lied to protect a player, he can't win with a question like that.
 
Interviewers ask about substituations with a view to upcoming games, such as coming off injured. It was obvious Hammond was subbed cause he was playing bad, Stevie Wonder could see that. If he wasn't after a reaction why only ask about the Hammond substituation and not the other two?
Because most substitutions happen mid to late second half and not at half time unless he wanted to alter formation or due to an injury?..... Problem was Adkins didn't want to admit his love child Hammond was utterly wank
 
He's picked up on young players perceived mistakes all season. While we have captain calamity dropping one most games.
 
Interviewers ask about substituations with a view to upcoming games, such as coming off injured. It was obvious Hammond was subbed cause he was playing bad, Stevie Wonder could see that. If he wasn't after a reaction why only ask about the Hammond substituation and not the other two?
The interviewer can ask what ever the hell he likes as long as it's about the game. To me, the manager can then either answer directly, or refuse citing the reason why. Both acceptable responses to me. What isn't acceptable is waffle.
 
Because most substitutions happen mid to late second half and not at half time unless he wanted to alter formation or due to an injury?..... Problem was Adkins didn't want to admit his love child Hammond was utterly wank

He admitted it by taking him off!
 
If he is talkin about the foxes they only had one season in this shite league and did they win it???we are 5 encounting.............could he be on about the grunters?
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03tjfh8

Sounds to me like he is on his way as he slagged off the fans on several occasions.

When asked about substitution of Hammond he blocked it by saying he doesn't have to justify his subs to the reporter.

Said we'd been on fire in training but it was hot today and we didn't carry the intensity into the game. Maybe they trained too hard (well that puts your computer based stats packages on player energy and performance into cock, then)

Been here before and knows crowd can be on players backs - it's always been the same and will in all probability continue to be so.

Shifted out 25 players and bemoans fact that he has brought in fewest number of players in the league. Two perm and 4 on loan.

Crowd was moaning from first game of season (who fucking wouldn't being stuffed 4-0 at Gillingham) and its continued on for the rest of the season.

Sitting down with all players one on one next week to determine their futures.

Well let's hope they all fuck off and Adkins with them.


TWAT




Waffle
And so say all of us. . . . .
 
This happens at every club with a decent fan base, if you do shit you get shit. If you do well the fans get behind you. Simple really.
 
Why has Adkins regularly subbed Hammond if he thinks he can do no wrong?
Maybe even Nigel can see he can only trot for 60 minutes, hasn't stopped him bigging him up at most oportunities.
 
Was it not obvious to you why Hammond was subbed? He was playing shite, gifted Scunny a goal and the fans were on his back. I don't see why Adkins needs to publicly slag off a player especially on the last game of the season. Think the interviewer was being a bit of a cock trying to get Adkins to criticise a player to be honest.
If that's too difficult a question for him to answer he shouldn't be in the job ,its obviously too fucking much for him. As for him protecting his precious little lambs who we indirectly pay millions of pounds a year too, why the pissing hell should he do that. If they play wank say they play wank ,instead of telling a journalist wrongly how to do his job and coming out with his usual monotone boring pre prepared bullshit about endeavour and all that horseshit. Kick a few of their expensive arses and man up ,you never know they might try a little bit more next week and not have to come off to be dressed in cotton wool while being handed a few grand for doing fuck all.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom