It's just modern football: keep the ball - work an opening.
Of course it is - but how do you create an opening - either by beating a player with skill or by movement. There are developments in the game of course but pass and move are basics that will never go away.We build from the back (possibly because neither of our goalkeepers have good distribution) and have players who don't possess the skill to beat players and who have to rely on movement ahead of them. Murphy has gone. Ahead of them too many times they see statues. Contrast Sharp who is constantly moving with some of the others - particularly earlier this season. It doesn't help that, Sharp excepted, we have forwards who are poor at holding the ball up. So the sideways passing goes on and on with little progression because nothing is opening up. Brayford's return has been a huge bonus since he returned and with the current set-up most of our creativity is going down the right - Basham has the touch of an elephant when it comes to passing. Once the right has been shut down we end up resorting to the hope that the one player (Baxter) who can pass a ball (despite concerns about other aspects of his game, his general attitude and off -pitch behaviour) can produce a "worldy" pass.
Wallace is a basket case and doesn't demonstrate anything.
I agree Wallace is a basket case who should never have got past the medical - if he had one. I have consistently said this since we signed him. But this is the player that Sheffield United Football Club made the mistake of signing and who claimed he had been fit for months when he moved to Shrewsbury. If he was it begs an awful lot of questions.
Can't see how this is anything other than made up.
Of course there is an element of conjecture and perception and, unless you are privy to the SUFC dressing room, so are everyone's opinions, including yours.
If anything was at fault it was the system - this is not a criticism - I'm glad he tried it. It didn't work. Fine. We move on.
Adkins said he had to change from a more positive style of football to find one that worked results wise in terms of the players he had and acknowledged that we aren't the best team - in other words the players aren't good enough to play that system and he has had to sacrifice creativity to shore up the weak defence to grind out results.
Presumes it was a screw-up. We didn't panic buy. We didn't sell. We offloaded some (but not enough) players from a big squad. We didn't recruit. The End of the World is Nigh?
I did say private reaction. The end of the world is nigh ? No, but Sheffield United is a football club I care about and want to see do well. I hope that isn't a problem. They do say that sarcasm is the lowest form of wit but I do have to have to point out that I can listen to and read interviews as well as anyone and ask "Did Adkin's tell you all this over a tin of lager on a bench in Endcliffe Park?".
When does this ever happen? Istm abuse makes the abuser feel better - and that's about it. It's demotivational and entirely self-centred. Abusing the players works against the interests of the team and the club.
What a narrow definition of fears you choose to use. I was referring to the collective fears that human beings have but in their case that they won't get a new contract with SUFC, that their future in the game is on a downward slope, that they will be made to look an idiot, that they will lose concentration or make a mistake etc. To simply focus on, and use the loaded term, "abuse" is not balanced and is symptomatic of a perspective that does not see any criticism as valid or constructive. And yes I know there are some idiot abusers in the crowd who get off on it, but not 20,000 of them. If it gets to the point where the majority or a significant minority of the support feel it necessary to join in singing "You're not fit to wear the shirt" at a game in which we were truly atrocious then that could equally be seen as a valid judgement on what they are paying good money to see. Interestingly our performances have improved since that happened. I hope, as I always do, that the supporters get behind the team and help the players, but they can't do it for them. The players have a responsibility also. The primary one.
I have a hard time believing any post that asserts anything is simple as (or concludes with end of). If it was so simple there'd be a Ladybird Book of Sheffield United.
Bully for you. Personally I have a low tolerance of literacy snobs (particularly those who use text speak because they are too lazy to type the words) and who use their snobbery to obfuscate, undermine or deflect an argument.
The players have chased endless lost causes
Some have and more so lately but equally I can recall Freeman frequently being caught well out of position and ambling back or switching off or losing the player he was supposed to be marking at set pieces leading to us conceding, Done very recently just giving upon chasing a ball that was eminently gettable, Baxter and Reed standing around like little boys lost whilst we were over-run in midfield, Scougall hiding behind players so he doesn't have to take a pass, McNulty waiting for someone to stick something on a plate for him and not working the defence. There are very few in the side who I could say clearly give everything - Brayford, Sharp, Basham, Hammond. How many of our players ask for the ball ? How many of them show for it ? How many switch off or lose concentration (especially when defending) ?