Incoming? Dan Burn

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

I'll get slated for this but do we need anyone now?
We seem very solid over that last 4 games or so and would disruption have a negative impact on the team performances? Who's to say that a new CB would deffo hit the ground running?

Edgar and Collins are working well together (at last)

Now where did I put that tin hat?

No slating from me mate but I still think we need 3 / 4 key players in on loans or transfers to have a chance of realistically making the play-offs.

And as much of the dead-wood shipped out as possible.

UTB & FTP
 

I think that it's inevitable that some will come in but hope it works out how we want it to.
 
THIRD TIME LUCKY?

The Sheffield Star is reporting that Sheffield United may try a third bid for Fulham's Dan Burn following Slavisa Jokanovic’s recent appointment.

Nigel Adkins has tried twice before to sign the defender, but the change of manager could see the Blades trying their luck once again as the Cottagers also look to relieve the pressure under their transfer embargo

From the sky sports transfer centre

They got it from the star so probably nothing in it, but thought I would share anyway
 
Back to the bargain basket I guess then. We couldn't possibly steal a player that a team wants to keep.
I guess the key is whether Burn is happy in London if not and wants out we could be in.He,s on a free at season end(24in april ) so if he refuses a new contract he can walk in summer.Fulham will accept a smaller offer if that's the case,we will see.
 
We should hang on until the window closes
At least that way the fans will know we have tried our hardest to get a quality centre half in and not some clogger who we actually have a chance of signing

Everyone knows it takes at least 2 years to sign a centre half
 
He's playing in Fulham's first team ffs!
It's not like he's Brayford/Cardiff situation...
 

Back on?!?! Soccersauce on twitter thinks so, seems a reliable source, gots lots right in recent times...
 
Back on?!?! Soccersauce on twitter thinks so, seems a reliable source, gots lots right in recent times...

Just read that. Don't like the comments from the Fulham fans below. Doesn't see they rate him
 
How Fulham can work around their transfer embargo and recruit new players this January
Craven Cottage club have been hit with ban after breaching Football League rules


Rob Foldy/Getty Images
GettyImages-453364362.jpg

Man at the top: Fulham chairman Shahid Khan looks on
The January window is starting to heat up but Fulham supporters are still cursing a transfer embargo imposed on the club last month.

Fulham confirmed in a statement released at the end of the December that the club had made a loss greater than the £6million limit allowed by the Football League in the year following relegation.

But the transfer ban does not mean Craven Cottage is shut for business this winter and it could still be a busy few weeks for the west Londoners.

Ross McCormack and Moussa Dembele are both attracting attention as the Whites battle to keep hold of their star strikeforce.

Stoke City’s Steve Sidwell is being lined up for a return to the Cottage on a loan move, just one of the ways the Whites can work around the embargo.

Let’s take a closer look at the rules of the ban and how Fulham could still recruit fresh blood for the second half of the season…

Restrictions and loopholes


Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images
GettyImages-488589384_594_screen.jpg

Boss: Head coach Slavisa Jokanovic looks on
Fulham have been prevented from registering new players, whether they are coming to the football club on a loan or permanent basis, under the rules of Financial Fair Play.

However, the club is allowed to add new names to their roster if they have 24 or fewer established players, who are defined as being aged 21 or older and have at least five starting appearances for the club under their belt, on the books and certain other criteria are met.

The Whites cannot pay, or commit to pay, any transfer or compensation fees for a player. They are permitted to sign an emergency goalkeeper, but only in line with existing regulations.

For incoming players, clubs can only pay Agents’ Fees as a benefit in kind to the player in question (as long as they do not exceed the £600,000 employee costs limit).

Loans, like that of Sidwell’s rumoured one , can be agreed but no fees can be paid to the parent club. Fulham can pay a contribution of a loanee’s wage packet.

Replenishing the Fulham ranks


JS72856065.jpg

Transfer talk: Could Fulham's Ross McCormack leave in January?
If Fulham reach a stage where they have less than 24 established stars in their ranks, Slavisa Jokanovic will be able to start looking at replenishing his squad with signings.

But the Whites can only add a new addition, regardless of their age of playing experience, if the employee costs of a the signing are less than £600,000 per annum - or pro-rata if signed on a shorter contract.

It is also worth noting that the Championship club is allowed to register players under the age of 21 for non-first team matches.

Should there already be more than 24 players on the books, Fulham can still sign players on a ‘one in, one out basis’ this month.

There are restrictions on this though and the costs of bringing the player to west London cannot exceed either 75 per cent of the player heading out, or again, a maximum of £600,000 per annum - or pro-rata if signed on a shorter contract.

Club statement in full


4463100.jpg

Keeping the faith: A general view of Fulham fans before a match
Following the announcement made by the Football League, Fulham Football Club can confirm that it faces a transfer embargo during the January 2016 window.

The embargo arises as the club made an adjusted loss greater than the £6m limit allowed by the Football League in the year following relegation.

The Football League has since recognised this limit is low, especially for clubs recently relegated with Premier League overheads in place, and the limit has now increased to £13m per annum.

Unfortunately Fulham's embargo falls in the final year of the previous limit, but the club does not anticipate being in breach in future years.

The action imposed by the League has been anticipated since the summer, which saw a sustained period of investment in the team with that understanding.

The purchase of players such as Ross McCormack and Matt Smith (in summer 2014), to enable the club to compete effectively in the League, were the result of that investment.

The period of embargo will be imposed during January 2016 and the club will be able to fully trade again in the summer 2016 transfer window.

It will still be possible for the club to trade within the set FFP limits, and therefore the potential of recruiting players is still something that the club will look to do, if the right players are available.
http://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/how-fulham-can-work-around-10694820
 
I agree it would be a very good signing but he's not the pacey player that we need at CB. I'm not knocking him just thought folks would like to know what FFC fans thought of him
It does seem that he is playing well atm.

Could all be talk - no substance anyway !
 
Looking at the Fulham reports he doesn't sound too sparkling..

Hope we're not going to do another Hammond and big him up before we've seen him play...
 
I couldn't give a fuck if we sign him or not.

The fact we've chased him since the summer and put up with an inept defence for more than half of the season, and have continued to be interested in him for most of January is embarrassing and a piss poor way to run a football club. Move on Blades.
 

He's just this seasons Ogrady (excuse?) if we don't sign anybody then it's a poor show from the board, I think Adkins wants a centre half desperately, are his hands tied?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom