Who would you sell in January?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

ThatJa

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
5,894
Reaction score
9,051
Location
Gleadless
Porter - Waste of a wage, never in the 18 man squad.
Flynn - Just not the same player he was last year.
Butler - Do I need to say why?
 



Our best player to the lowest bidder - why change the habit of a lifetime? :p

Seriously Butler has to go even if it is a cancelled contract to get his wages out of the FFP calculation - unless they can kiss and make up but I can't see that happening if Doyle is still at the club. I can't see any future for Porter here. McGinn will probably not be missed either - so low in the pecking order it would probably do him a favour to go even if it is on loan.
 
Last edited:
Jose ,Im afraid ,one player we could get money for which could be better invested in a player we can use in this division.
 
Flynn - Just not the same player he was last year.

Whilst Flynn is undoubtedly not in the form he was last year (when, he also had a differing right back/central midfield), I don't quite get why he's still currently being picked out before some of the others.

For me, he's been better than Murphy and Scougall, he's been more consistent than Campbell-Ryce and the Player Ratings on here show him as having 4 "man of the match" performances.
 
Whilst Flynn is undoubtedly not in the form he was last year (when, he also had a differing right back/central midfield), I don't quite get why he's still currently being picked out before some of the others.

For me, he's been better than Murphy and Scougall, he's been more consistent than Campbell-Ryce and the Player Ratings on here show him as having 4 "man of the match" performances.
I'm surprised at those stats. I can't believe he gets to start in front of JCR. Or that any of the others do, for that matter.

He had a good back end to the season but needs to be consistantly at the top of his game to be good enough in the third division.

Scougal and Murphy have far more potential, but I'd agree all are misfiring right now.

UTB
 
Im surprised at those stats. I can't believe he gets to start in front of JCR. Or Thst any of the others do, for that matter.

On this seasons form, I'd probably start JCR on the right and Flynn on the left on Saturday, switch them periodically.
 
Jose ,Im afraid ,one player we could get money for which could be better invested in a player we can use in this division.

Because we've got a track record of re-investing transfer revenue! :rolleyes:

Nope, I'd rather keep our best player than have some money sat in the bank, thank you very much.
 
On this seasons form, I'd probably start JCR on the right and Flynn on the left on Saturday, switch them periodically (but mainly favouring their stronger foot).
Flynn prefers to play on the left even though he is right footed
 
Id let Cuvelier go out on loan for a few months once fit.

Sell McGinn

Sell Butler

Give away Porter
 
Ched, if he's not fully fit / found any form.
Porter, waste of a wage.
Butler, waste of a wage.
McGinn, about 6th in line (after Doyle, Wallace, Scougall, Basham, Reed)
 
Ched, if he's not fully fit / found any form.
Porter, waste of a wage.
Butler, waste of a wage.
McGinn, about 6th in line (after Doyle, Wallace, Scougall, Basham, Reed)

Probably 7th choice after Flo is fit.
 
it is a sorry state of affairs when the only real asset we have from a transfer monetary point of view is Jose.. Mr Clough and Mr Clough brother will tinker with the side in January with incomings and outgoings to confuse us even more . As always with the Blades , expect the unexpected.


UTB
 



So we judge Butler on a pre season gameFFS

A proven player at this level he's man of the match for Wallsall most weeks.
So we've inherited one of Warnocks cast offs to give him "game time" and will fuck off back to Palace leaving us to find a settled central defence again.
 
Totally agree Lane Ender . Butler would in my opinion resolve the back four problem and even create a settled CB partnership. The Palace chap is with us for a short period of time , and is only a stop gap solution . He may come good ,on the saturday before he returns back down the M1 to Palace . Never a dull moment being a blade , although we have no choice but to trust Mr Clough and Clough brother.

UTB
 
Whilst Flynn is undoubtedly not in the form he was last year (when, he also had a differing right back/central midfield), I don't quite get why he's still currently being picked out before some of the others.

For me, he's been better than Murphy and Scougall, he's been more consistent than Campbell-Ryce and the Player Ratings on here show him as having 4 "man of the match" performances.
I still think Flynn could make a decent fist at full back in a 4-2-3-1 or 3-5-2.
 
Jose ,Im afraid ,one player we could get money for which could be better invested in a player we can use in this division.
Reckon you're right Sitwell he's a luxury scores a few great goals but that's all.
 
Because we've got a track record of re-investing transfer revenue! :rolleyes:

Nope, I'd rather keep our best player than have some money sat in the bank, thank you very much.
How many times can I like this post??
Sell Jose?? He might be inconsistent but he's literally the only class player we have(I haven't seen wallace yet)
Mcnulty looks sharp, murphy is exciting at times, JCR has some brilliant spells and Flynn has some good moments but as far as technique goes they aren't fit to lace baxters boots..... Yeeeeer let's get shut and buy some more bashams
 
How many times can I like this post??
Sell Jose?? He might be inconsistent but he's literally the only class player we have(I haven't seen wallace yet)
Mcnulty looks sharp, murphy is exciting at times, JCR has some brilliant spells and Flynn has some good moments but as far as technique goes they aren't fit to lace baxters boots..... Yeeeeer let's get shut and buy some more bashams
What do you base this on ,a couple of good goals and a few Hollywood passes ,there are at least 6 players with better technique in our squad ,and 18 with better application. He is massively over rated in my opinion ,a luxury we cant carry and for me an average lower 3rd division player. I really don't get the hype that surrounds him.
 
I'm a big fan of Flynn in this team. With everyone at their best you'll get more creativity and more danger on the wings from Murphy and JCR, but Flynn gives you a more consistent 90 minutes with better work rate and much better defensive work.

Picking one from Flynn and Davies, and one from Murphy and JCR for the wide positions gives us good balance. Added that Davies is fine in the middle or at right back and Murphy can play up top means we can accommodate all four if desired.

Dunno who I'd sell, dunno who I'd buy for that matter!
 
What do you base this on ,a couple of good goals and a few Hollywood passes ,there are at least 6 players with better technique in our squad ,and 18 with better application. He is massively over rated in my opinion ,a luxury we cant carry and for me an average lower 3rd division player. I really don't get the hype that surrounds him.

Could argue McDonald was mostly full of those.

I think Baxter offers something different and can score quality goals on his day.
 
Jose ,Im afraid ,one player we could get money for which could be better invested in a player we can use in this division.

Couldn't disagree more.

We can use him in this division; he isn't a 'luxury' player as proven by his goals and influence in a mediocre (at best) Oldham side in this division.

Baxter should be the most advanced of our midfield three if we are going to continue with a loan striker.
 
Whilst Flynn is undoubtedly not in the form he was last year (when, he also had a differing right back/central midfield), I don't quite get why he's still currently being picked out before some of the others.

For me, he's been better than Murphy and Scougall, he's been more consistent than Campbell-Ryce and the Player Ratings on here show him as having 4 "man of the match" performances.

I see his MoMs include:

  • 7.86 for the Orient away game (2nd highest Howard 5.68),
  • 9.21 for his 20 minute sub appearance at Colchester (2nd highest: Davies 7.07)
  • 7.19 for his 25 minutes at Swindon (2nd highest McNulty 5.52)
Looks a bit generous.
 
I think Baxter should go. And Wallace. And JCR. Then with the transfer money we could [REDACTED] and then maybe [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

It's patently obvious that the winning strategy is investing in the club's finances. We have two and a half million quid made from the sale of Maguire, shitloads saved from Clough buying some other priceless players and with more money for players who have suddenly started to show promise, we can really [REDACTED] which would be a Game Changing Investment to beat the bank.

Halleuia!

pommpey
 
What do you base this on ,a couple of good goals and a few Hollywood passes ,there are at least 6 players with better technique in our squad ,and 18 with better application. He is massively over rated in my opinion ,a luxury we cant carry and for me an average lower 3rd division player. I really don't get the hype that surrounds him.
Everyone has an opinion, and I respect your wrong one
 
I'm just kiddin, but seriously....
I couldn't disagree with you anymore.
If there's 6 players with better ability than Baxter at the lane then I haven't seen them yet.
I will agree that he might slow the game down too much at times but he's the closest we have to McDonald now and he was my frikin hero. I love watching players like them two
 



What do you base this on ,a couple of good goals and a few Hollywood passes ,there are at least 6 players with better technique in our squad ,and 18 with better application. He is massively over rated in my opinion ,a luxury we cant carry and for me an average lower 3rd division player. I really don't get the hype that surrounds him.
Baxter is a luxury that has single handedly,when others weren't performing,kept us out of the relegation places,that's what i'd base it on.You don't get rid of your BETTER players.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom