More Bladier than thou
There's only one Alan Kelly
hull are now making up their mind about the HM bid. they may not want to proceed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
hull are now making up their mind about the HM bid. they may not want to proceed.
17:45 Sky sources understand Harry Maguire has undergone a medical in Hull today and he should be announced as their latest signing in the next 24 hoursI think they think they now have United by the short and curlies. They know United want rid.
"Well, we know we offered £2m last week, but we are now thinking about this bloke at Crewe, he's as good as your bloke and we can get him for £1m, we don't know about Harry now....."
If the tantrum story is true, it seems they do work....
If my auntie had bollocks she's be my Uncle. There's no way we could know eitherway what he would have done should a Premiership club come in for him.If we'd gone up he may well have stayed?
In the OS article the open ended quotes are there again. Forgot which thread these were discussed on recently.
Paragraphs 2 & 3 have opening quotation marks but not closing ones. I'm sure I read somewhere that that means it isn't an "official" quote and only parts of the quote is correct OR that a few parts of the statement have been cut up and made into a made up sentence. Anyway.. the final paragraph opens and ends with quotation marks but 2 & 3 don't.
http://www.sufc.co.uk/news/article/20140728-maguire-update-1786224.aspx
Perhaps communications were agreed by both clubs prior to publication as looking at it both save save face with what has been published. It will all be forgotten if we splash the cash on a striker but there will a shit storm of criticism that will never be far away way until we are10 point clears by the end of Sept.I think you're right about the Hull statement and the chain of events with the bids. But why did we even release a statement this morning at all? I can't see what it accomplishes.If they thought it would mollify the fans, then they have misjudged the situation. I think fans would rather have seen the sale done with the minimum of fuss in a way that would allow us to move on with other targets. Now this bizarre affair will dominate the agenda and makes us look very silly indeed, and fans will be more pissed off than they were to begin with.
Indeed Maguire can now be referred as a piggy bastard.Harry Maguire is irrelevant to us now. I won't be proud or bitter watching him on Match of the Day (that's if he makes an appearance). After all, I'd much rather have Nigel Clough with Sheffield United than Harry Maguire with Sheffield United. Thanks for the memories Harry but this will prove to be a mistake on your behalf.
Andy Giddings just posted on twitter - NC on Maguire: " We've accepted the offer this morning. It's a different offer."
So what exactly does different mean?
Don't mind most of your post pinchers,but you or anyone else for that matter cannot tell me that what clough said was not an out and out lie,there was nothing wrong when Harry was running up and down the line that night and there wasn't only me who saw it.Just a few things:
I've listened very carefully to Nigel's interview. Perhaps a wise thing to do rather than try to interpret partisan website statements as though you were the Rosetta Stone.
One thing is clear, Nigel is both frustrated and disappointed by Maguire. No doubt in my mind that the foolish young man has tried to manipulate a situation and has behaved unprofessionally (on Friday it would appear) You don't stand for that if your name's Clough. Quite right too.
Nigel has not 'lied to the fans' Wiz. If anyone is guilty of a bit of exaggeration and selective sunbathing I suggest we look towards the departing player!
However, what is NC to do in that situation. Say 'no comment' and be accused of keeping us in the dark? Tell the full story whereupon Hull reduce their offer immediately and substantially? Sometimes, in commercial transactions, it's more complicated than simple black or white. NC's duty to us is to manage in the best interests of our club, not to feed an insatiable appetite for news and gossip.
HRH has not fooked off. He remains co-owner of our club and his contractual obligation to invest remains exactly the same. The very capable Jim Phipps is simply doing more of what he did before with a slightly grander title. He is entitled, by the way, to be very disappointed when he reads some of the more emotive nonsense written on here today.
A little loose with the convient truths there aren't we?The lad is probably setting himself up for life. Just for the money alone who can honestly blame him? Nearly all of us would do the same.
It makes me laugh when supporters come out with all this nonsense about players being disloyal, only caring about money etc. Loyalty and regular football don't come into the equation, it's about doing something that is an absolute no brainer.
I would love to see such critics stay in their job when someone else offers them a 400% pay rise.
I can't believe people are wishing HM all the best with the move when it looks increasingly likely that he and his agent are trying to force the move through?
If he conducted himself professionally and eventually we agreed terms then he could go with our blessings?
But to try and fake sunstroke........
A little loose with the convient truths there aren't we?
400% pay rise but potentially killing your career in 18 months would be interesting to see if anyone would take it.
Seen a few folk take volunterary redundancy over the past few years for double their wages. Now they can't get back into the workplace at anything close to what they earnt before, even having to retrain completely and start again for low pay.
Others I've known took the money and walked straight into another job on similar or better money. Depends on how good you are, a fair portion of luck and timing.
It's just journalistic style. Nothing to read into there mate.In the OS article the open ended quotes are there again. Forgot which thread these were discussed on recently.
Paragraphs 2 & 3 have opening quotation marks but not closing ones. I'm sure I read somewhere that that means it isn't an "official" quote and only parts of the quote is correct OR that a few parts of the statement have been cut up and made into a made up sentence. Anyway.. the final paragraph opens and ends with quotation marks but 2 & 3 don't.
http://www.sufc.co.uk/news/article/20140728-maguire-update-1786224.aspx
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?