Frank the tank
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2020
- Messages
- 10,111
- Reaction score
- 22,173
MarseilleNo Johnny Rowe in Norwich squad. Looks like Leeds all but signed him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
MarseilleNo Johnny Rowe in Norwich squad. Looks like Leeds all but signed him
How could anyone get it ‘confirmed’ … again?Wrong again️
If they are demanding selection if fit Shirley that’s 3rd party influence. They can give us incentives to play him ie so much back if he makes X appearances. Not sure how it all worksTo be honest i would be reluctant to complete a loan deal for Rak-Sakyi because the demands of his parent club are demanding :
a) 7 figure loan fee at least £1m
b) Option to recall player in January ‘25
C) Guaranteed selection if fit
d) An increase in the players current salary
I am sure he would be an excellent acquisition but i feel Crystal Palace /player are writing the loan agreement too much in their favour,sometimes you think you are being taken for a mug…….if it was me i would look elsewhere,he needs to want to play for us,i get the feeling it’s all about the deal.
d) was something WE offered to try to swing the deal our wayTo be honest i would be reluctant to complete a loan deal for Rak-Sakyi because the demands of his parent club are demanding :
a) 7 figure loan fee at least £1m
b) Option to recall player in January ‘25
C) Guaranteed selection if fit
d) An increase in the players current salary
I am sure he would be an excellent acquisition but i feel Crystal Palace /player are writing the loan agreement too much in their favour,sometimes you think you are being taken for a mug…….if it was me i would look elsewhere,he needs to want to play for us,i get the feeling it’s all about the deal.
If they are demanding selection if fit Shirley that’s 3rd party influence. They can give us incentives to play him ie so much back if he makes X appearances. Not sure how it all works
Especially playing on front of those fans - what an absolute credit to the club they are , considering the shite they’ve had to watch last seasonHe’s just repeating what already been reported. It means, as reported he’s verbally agreed to join us.
Now it’s just a case of having a medical and signing the paper work (the formalities).
People are 90% confident he’s ours but of course there’s always a 10% chance we could be gazumped right at the end.
Might sound daft but think our convincing performance against PNE might have the effect of making players with the smallest of doubts wanting to play for us.
Think it means dotting the I ‘s and what Notting the restSorry, I dont get it, what does that mean?
Sorry, I dont get it, what does that mean?
I’m actually not sure that clock would ever be right.
Completely understand why Palace wish to ensure their player gets week in, week out playing time.....but what if his form dips? Are we expected to have him in a starting position even if he's struggling? Surely there has to some sort of accommodation whereby we decide who's selected based on current form, which acts as an incentive for the loan player to be on his game.Southampton offered £7-10m or something for him permanently and they turned it down, so if they’re going to loan him to the league below instead then 100% they’ll want assurances of playing time as well as a hefty fee and contributions - no qualms there, they hold all the cards but I’m convinced he’ll be excellent for us.
As you said takeover has fell through it might be a bit ambitious.....then again you maybe full of shit?Get this one over the line. Throw in a decent keeper, another striker (or two) and perhaps another defender and I don’t think we’ll be too far away from having the required depth in the squad to maintain competitiveness
I imagine it’ll be tied to the fees. Play a certain % of minutes or make so many starts to avoid financial penalties. Obviously if he isn’t performing then we take the hit financially instead. I don’t think that’s abnormal either, just what tends to come with loaning young premier league players.Completely understand why Palace wish to ensure their player gets week in, week out playing time.....but what if his form dips? Are we expected to have him in a starting position even if he's struggling? Surely there has to some sort of accommodation whereby we decide who's selected based on current form, which acts as an incentive for the loan player to be on his game.
The guy looks like a 'baller, but until he's out on the pitch facing defenders who'd happily put him on his arse then any agreement that insists on playing time makes a mockery of Wilder's role........must say though, from the little I've seen he does look
decent and offers the type of threat any team would love to have on their books.
Bit like Preston’s rugby tackles last nightCompletely understand why Palace wish to ensure their player gets week in, week out playing time.....but what if his form dips? Are we expected to have him in a starting position even if he's struggling? Surely there has to some sort of accommodation whereby we decide who's selected based on current form, which acts as an incentive for the loan player to be on his game.
The guy looks like a 'baller, but until he's out on the pitch facing defenders who'd happily put him on his arse then any agreement that insists on playing time makes a mockery of Wilder's role........must say though, from the little I've seen he does look
decent and offers the type of threat any team would love to have on their books.
I’m pretty sure that was the deal with Ben Woodburn & we opted to pay the money rather than play him.I imagine it’ll be tied to the fees. Play a certain % of minutes or make so many starts to avoid financial penalties. Obviously if he isn’t performing then we take the hit financially instead. I don’t think that’s abnormal either, just what tends to come with loaning young premier league players.
I’m pretty sure that was the deal with Ben Woodburn & we opted to pay the money rather than play him.
BrookesFrom last nite starters,who makes way for RS.
Gone to SalfordI’m pretty sure that was the deal with Ben Woodburn & we opted to pay the money rather than play him.
Whoever he dislodges as it should beFrom last nite starters,who makes way for RS.
That’s where we went today ! In amongst the dirties. Train full of pommpey fans from changing in Sheffield,they only started a couple of songs when they trooped off the train.Gone to Leeds................SHOPPING.
Looks like Brookes - unless someone else leavesWhoever he dislodges as it should be
Looks like Brookes - unless someone else leaves
![]()
Sheffield United: Rak-Sakyi deal would be a blow to Chris Wilder favourite's chances of game-time - View
Crystal Palace winger Jesurun Rak-Sakyi is set to join Sheffield United on loan.footballleagueworld.co.uk
Ideally sakyi runs full back into ground and brooks replaced him round the hour mark and takes advantageLooks like Brookes - unless someone else leaves
![]()
Sheffield United: Rak-Sakyi deal would be a blow to Chris Wilder favourite's chances of game-time - View
Crystal Palace winger Jesurun Rak-Sakyi is set to join Sheffield United on loan.footballleagueworld.co.uk
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?