You’ll never read a JJ post where exaggeration doesn’t override accuracy.
Firstly the comparison with those two is ridiculous. Both longstanding PL sides who built their new grounds with large waiting lists for ST’s and billionaire backers. Oh, and London based.
Arsenal were effectively hog tied financially for a number of years after building the Emirates and despite income increasing to around a £100m pa over their neighbours, Spurs have over £1b of debt and are making huge losses every year.
Arsenal have never achieved turnover of £500m, let alone £600 while Spurs have achieved over £500m once. £560m for 22/23. The Spurs model is exceptional, NFL, AIA etc and will reap the benefits, football wise, will the debt affect their player spend like it did Arsenal?
Still, let’s play fast and loose with figures to try and hammer home the latest dig at United. It was ever thus.