CONFIRMED Sam McCallum

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Squad left back with the potential to start and a right sided utility man wouldn’t be a bad start to the summers business really
Squad left back? I would be expecting him to start for us.

Shackleton would imagine is a squad player.
 

Squad left back? I would be expecting him to start for us.

Shackleton would imagine is a squad player.
I’d want another potential starter (hopefully RND) if he can get fit and let them have a proper competition because he’s been a bit hit and miss since his move Norwich but I thought McCallum was an obvious target for us this summer on a free and I’ll be happy if we get him.

Yeah could see Shackleton as a right footed equivalent of Ozzy.
 
I’d want another potential starter (hopefully RND) if he can get fit and let them have a proper competition because he’s been a bit hit and miss since his move Norwich but I thought McCallum was an obvious target for us this summer on a free and I’ll be happy if we get him.

Yeah could see Shackleton as a right footed equivalent of Ozzy.
Yeah agree with this. But I don’t see us still going for another left back. We are seemingly on the budget pre Americans. It’s not usual to have a squad with 3 left sided full backs.

Especially when there’s so many holes still within the squad.
 
Shackleton is definitely a Wilder type

I'd be pleased with him on a free. Bogle cover and a central midfield option.
 
Local press there reporting its just the payment plan that's holding up the deal for Burrows - and Rocket Man (who has been more reliable than Rifleman I believe) has said Burrows is close

Maybe we're moving RND to LCB?
i think thats a distinct possibility maybe with rnd's injuries wilder sees him more as a lcb also think trusty may be moved central or even sold
 
But on Friday Rocketman said burrows was very close, but we are signing a free LWB this week and Shackleton. All things can’t be true
 

Two more midgets to add to a squad that has to compete in a division well known for it's physicality.

I know money may be very tight and I'm sure many on here will know more about both players than me but it's a very underwhelming start in my opinion.

Hopefully, both will prove me wrong.

utb
 
But on Friday Rocketman said burrows was very close, but we are signing a free LWB this week and Shackleton. All things can’t be true
McCallum and Shackleton named on Twitter so it’s normal for ITKs to then post on here what Twitter is saying.
 
Two more midgets to add to a squad that has to compete in a division well known for it's physicality.

I know money may be very tight and I'm sure many on here will know more about both players than me but it's a very underwhelming start in my opinion.

Hopefully, both will prove me wrong.

utb
McCallum is 5ft 10 and according to reports is excellent in the air. For a full back he is hardly a midget.
 
McCallum is 5ft 10 and according to reports is excellent in the air. For a full back he is hardly a midget.
1.77m (5'8") on the internet when I looked. Small by modern standards.
Might be ok for a full back but we don't tend to play full backs.
Just think we might struggle in this respect a bit if this is the stature of player we are targeting alongside our alleged interest in Shackleton.
We'll see.

utb
 
1.77m (5'8") on the internet when I looked. Small by modern standards.
Might be ok for a full back but we don't tend to play full backs.
Just think we might struggle in this respect a bit if this is the stature of player we are targeting alongside our alleged interest in Shackleton.
We'll see.

utb
1.77m is 5 foot 10...
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom