Deep financial trouble ahead

[Sean Thornton]

Irrespective of whether he is saying is true or not you often state that someone should reveal their source when they can’t and you scoff at the same time you then threaten that legal action would follow if they did. I have always wondered why you do this. I could never reveal my sources as it would not go to well for the person/s passing on the information. The prince doesn’t take very kindly to people revealing info and can turn nasty. You have stated before about legal action and it sounds like you want to warn people off from saying anything damaging.You must have a motive as you’ve done it on numerous occasions. The prince is renowned for imposing ndas on people that go as far as they can’t say they’ve had an NDA otherwise they have breached it. I know this for a cert and couldn’t say with who and why because of the ramifications of it being revealed.

Please provide the links to the claims you’ve made. Let’s start there.

 

[Sean Thornton]

You know for a cert that people have signed NDAs saying they can't say they've signed an NDA?

I'm sorry, but that is total bullshit.

Even if they tried to write that into the NDA there would be no legal standpoint if someone asked them a question they were not allowed to respond saying the reason they can't answer is because theyve signed a non disclosure.

Unless of course it's all bullshit.

I'm starting to think Laney Blade / Andy67 / Rifleman is all the same person just rotating each time one of them loses credibility.

I guess Foxy would know via IP addresses.

Probably being fed by the same gobshite who lost his position at the Lane due to holding court in the pub playing Mr Big.

 

[Sean Thornton]

Loan fee only. As i said at the end of last season we won’t be spending anything and in effect with outgoings we didn’t.

Fuck me he’s got something right. Open the stickies…….

Well almost right.

 

[Andy67]

You know for a cert that people have signed NDAs saying they can't say they've signed an NDA?

I'm sorry, but that is total bullshit.

Even if they tried to write that into the NDA there would be no legal standpoint if someone asked them a question they were not allowed to respond saying the reason they can't answer is because theyve signed a non disclosure.

Unless of course it's all bullshit.

I'm starting to think Laney Blade / Andy67 / Rifleman is all the same person just rotating each time one of them loses credibility.

I guess Foxy would know via IP addresses.

They’ve signed such agreement but are not allowed to say he had but just said nothing. One individual springs to mind, As much as you don’t like it the source was credible and it was borne out in reality not any mention of any such agreement was signed.

 

[Gannon's perm]

Please provide the links to the claims you’ve made. Let’s start there.

Claims, that are supported and substantiated by actual evidence
I don't think that'll catch on here
Lie big and lie often seems to be the modus operandi. If called out, double down and if all else fails, simply end a post with 'fact'. It's irrefutable then

 

[Andy67]

Probably being fed by the same gobshite who lost his position at the Lane due to holding court in the pub playing Mr Big.

You are goading me into a response I can’t give, you know i cant and so do those you defend often stating get ready i hope you have good lawyers. You also pull that one out that disgruntled former employee to try and discredit what I’m saying. Laughable thing is you know jack shit whereas i know for certain such an agreement was signed. At this point you start saying shut up or legal action. It isn’t a big deal but it managed to keep his mouth shut whilst the prince gave a very one sided interpretation of events

 

[Andy67]

Probably being fed by the same gobshite who lost his position at the Lane due to holding court in the pub playing Mr Big.

Who the fuck and what the fuck are you talking about.

 

[Sean Thornton]

Who the fuck and what the fuck are you talking about.

Let’s talk about Archer seeing as you’re not posting a link to your claims. This should be simple. Are you saying - categorically saying - it’s a loan not a transfer? You said loan fee.

 

[Sean Thornton]

Who the fuck and what the fuck are you talking about.

Can’t say, legal issues and that

 

[Sean Thornton]

You are goading me into a response I can’t give, you know i cant and so do those you defend often stating get ready i hope you have good lawyers. You also pull that one out that disgruntled former employee to try and discredit what I’m saying. Laughable thing is you know jack shit whereas i know for certain such an agreement was signed. At this point you start saying shut up or legal action. It isn’t a big deal but it managed to keep his mouth shut whilst the prince gave a very one sided interpretation of events

Makes no sense, forget Sunday afternoon is sit on your masters knee day to listen and learn.

 

[Andy67]

Let’s talk about Archer seeing as you’re not posting a link to your claims. This should be simple. Are you saying - categorically saying - it’s a loan not a transfer? You said loan fee.

I am saying that we have not bought archer

 

[Sean Thornton]

I am saying that we have not bought archer

You’ve shot your bolt kid. Liar, troll or just a plain and simple idiot.

 

[Andy67]

Comes under contingent and he’ll go back. I see you defend the club, what does it say we bought him for again?

 

[Sean Thornton]

Comes under contingent and he’ll go back. I see you defend the club, what does it say we bought him for again?

It says purchase. You said we hadn’t bought him. You’re wrong.

Well seeing it’s in the Post balance sheet section, it doesn’t. It does say we bought him though, which you said we hadn’t.


You really are a clown. Think it’s safe to say all your previous as well as future claims can be consigned to the bin.

 

[Andy67]

It says purchase. You said we hadn’t bought him. You’re wrong.

Well seeing it’s in the Post balance sheet section, it doesn’t. It does say we bought him though, which you said we hadn’t.


You really are a clown. Think it’s safe to say all your previous as well as future claims can be consigned to the bin.

So we’ve bought someone without paying a fee, shit accounting firm that produced a document saying a player was bought but forgets to state fee.

 

[Sean Thornton]

So we’ve bought someone without paying a fee, shit accounting firm that produced a document saying a player was bought but forgets to state fee.

It gets better Give it up kid, put the shovel down. You know nothing. Nothing at all. You’ve been caught out once and for all.

It’s over

 

[Andy67]

It gets better Give it up kid, put the shovel down. You know nothing. Nothing at all. You’ve been caught out once and for all.

It’s over

You work for them. We got there eventually, not so hard was it. Admit to being an accountant and we can then start discussing why you are defending the club

 

[Houston_Blade]

So we’ve bought someone without paying a fee, shit accounting firm that produced a document saying a player was bought but forgets to state fee.

Given your considerable expertise on the matter what exact details should be disclosed in the accounts?

 

[Nick Jansky]

So we’ve bought someone without paying a fee, shit accounting firm that produced a document saying a player was bought but forgets to state fee.

OK, so from this I think we can take the following:

1. You are calling Grant Thornton a shit accounting firm.

2. You are an expert on the disclosures that have to be made in statutory accounts.

3. You are stating that Sean Thornton works for United’s accountants.

Does that sum it up?

 

[Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn]

OK, so from this I think we can take the following:

1. You are calling Grant Thornton a shit accounting firm.

2. You are an expert on the disclosures that have to be made in statutory accounts.

3. You are stating that Sean Thornton works for United’s accountants.

Does that sum it up?

Aye
But you’ve overlooked:-
4. (S)he was kicked in the head by a horse in childhood

 

[Lower Drop Blade]

Nope, not flush but there’s excitement and positivity around the off field actions. To suggest we’re going to be in the shit seems to be somewhat off the mark.

I think it’s fair to say we won’t be spending big, but we won’t be treading water like last season so I’m led to believe.

I hope you are right

 

[gordoncharles]

So we’ve bought someone without paying a fee, shit accounting firm that produced a document saying a player was bought but forgets to state fee.

Andy, I don't know who you are but it would really be best if you stopped.

I'm an atheist myself but I do know what Proverbs 17:28 says. It's wise advice.

 

[Andy67]

Aye
But you’ve overlooked:-
4. (S)he was kicked in the head by a horse in childhood

What it doesn’t say in the accounts is the policy in terms of signings was getting as many quality players through the loan system. man city players sister clubs in a circuitous way in order to beat the loan system if some players could come through this without breaking rules it would be a success(dangerous strategy) Villa signing is a signing on paper but a loan in reality and by any means possible getting a number of loans without this one being a loan but returned is a loan

 

[Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn]

What it doesn’t say in the accounts is the policy in terms of signings was getting as many quality players through the loan system. man city players sister clubs in a circuitous way in order to beat the loan system if some players could come through this without breaking rules it would be a success(dangerous strategy) Villa signing is a signing on paper but a loan in reality and by any means possible getting a number of loans without this one being a loan but returned is a loan

Aye
I’m reliably informed that the horse has fully recovered from its traumatic experiences - shame I can’t say the same for yourself

 

[Silent Blade]

You are goading me into a response I can’t give, you know i cant and so do those you defend often stating get ready i hope you have good lawyers. You also pull that one out that disgruntled former employee to try and discredit what I’m saying. Laughable thing is you know jack shit whereas i know for certain such an agreement was signed. At this point you start saying shut up or legal action. It isn’t a big deal but it managed to keep his mouth shut whilst the prince gave a very one sided interpretation of events

 

[Bladesman]

Nope, not flush but there’s excitement and positivity around the off field actions. To suggest we’re going to be in the shit seems to be somewhat off the mark.

I think it’s fair to say we won’t be spending big, but we won’t be treading water like last season so I’m led to believe.

I think something is being lined up as you don't press ahead with all this if you didn't have either investors or a sale lined up.

 

[Jon B]

Andy, I don't know who you are but it would really be best if you stopped.

I'm an atheist myself but I do know what Proverbs 17:28 says. It's wise advice.

I had to look that one up.

I see it's an early version of:-

"It's better to keep your mouth shut and be suspected of being an idiot, than to open it and remove all doubt".

 

[CopenhagenBlade]

Will the truth of the Archer case be revealed at the end of the season? If it was a loan, carefully concealed as a transfer then Archer will be back at Villa, 1st July. No way Villa are buying him back on the basis of the this season. If he’s still here then it proves that Andy talks bollocks

 

[georgebernardshaw]

You work for them. We got there eventually, not so hard was it. Admit to being an accountant and we can then start discussing why you are defending the club

Admit to being an accountant?

 

[Houston_Blade]

What it doesn’t say in the accounts is the policy in terms of signings was getting as many quality players through the loan system. man city players sister clubs in a circuitous way in order to beat the loan system if some players could come through this without breaking rules it would be a success(dangerous strategy) Villa signing is a signing on paper but a loan in reality and by any means possible getting a number of loans without this one being a loan but returned is a loan