AWetFlannel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2016
- Messages
- 3,482
- Reaction score
- 5,285
Talk about childish...It’s still shit. Maybe actually strep it up before you go on your crusade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Talk about childish...It’s still shit. Maybe actually strep it up before you go on your crusade.
This forum is prone to condescension, but this has been a particularly tough read.
We have a problem which isn't a problem in other stadia. It isn't caused by the existence of standing/singing youths. These people exist in other grounds without much issue.
That the solution most people offer is "just sit in your own fucking seat" is pathetic.
Cards on the table Do you see anyway we get through this without having the back of the Kop netted and closed off?
I am afraid I don’t.
In fact I would go as far as to say the decision has already been made because both the club and the council must surely know the people in that area aren’t going to sit down.
Less shit than everywhere else. Not sure how people moving from the loudest section to another section would have helped (I never even knew about this btw). We need people sat on their hands in other sections to join.
Pointless people already in the best areas relocating.
No, never heard about it, certainly never noticed it or heard it.H Block is decent. But less shit is still shit.
You weren’t aware of the singing section?
The SCC are involved because there is a problem at BL, yes. Got no issue here. This problem doesn't exist at other stadia to anywhere near the same extent.Not as pathetic as the assertion that these youths aren’t causing the problem. Of course they are. This is specific to us from SCC. What’s happening at Old Trafford or Anfield is irrelevant. The problem has landed on our doorstep, council bias or not.
Well said mate. "Youths" isn't a fair description either imo, in my gangway the average age isn't majorly young.The SCC are involved because there is a problem at BL, yes. Got no issue here. This problem doesn't exist at other stadia to anywhere near the same extent.
Is the issue the existence of the youths? If so, why do the same youths at other stadia not cause the same issue?
Or, is the issue our lack of a large area of the ground where everyone stands. Due to this, our youth overcrowd the back of the kop. This isn't to justify it, or defend them, or blame anyone else.
The reason this is a problem for us is not the SCC being wankers (whether they are or not).
Added to the likelihood of Sheffield council agreeing to it without a full, nationwide trial first being precisely nil and the lingering possibility of the Kop one day being rebuilt, it was something shunted off to the horizon.
The SCC are involved because there is a problem at BL, yes. Got no issue here. This problem doesn't exist at other stadia to anywhere near the same extent.
Is the issue the existence of the youths? If so, why do the same youths at other stadia not cause the same issue?
Or, is the issue our lack of a large area of the ground where everyone stands. Due to this, our youth overcrowd the back of the kop. This isn't to justify it, or defend them, or blame anyone else.
The reason this is a problem for us is not the SCC being wankers (whether they are or not).
Took my nephew to his first game a few weeks ago and he loved it, he can't wait to go again. Now I'm not going to be able to take him unless I move my season ticket.
I couldn't wait to take him in the Kop and for him experience that![]()
I think the point was when people who are now 40+ stood at the back of the Kop the stand was all standing, not all seated.Might be that, as some have already admitted, people that are 40+ have originally stood at the back of the kop without the right tickets, and now some yoof are trying to do the same.
The yoof can't be seen as worse because they got there second. They want to chant and go to the only place that consistently does. We should have sorted a larger standing and singing section ages ago.
The SCC are involved because there is a problem at BL, yes. Got no issue here. This problem doesn't exist at other stadia to anywhere near the same extent.
Is the issue the existence of the youths? If so, why do the same youths at other stadia not cause the same issue?
Or, is the issue our lack of a large area of the ground where everyone stands. Due to this, our youth overcrowd the back of the kop. This isn't to justify it, or defend them, or blame anyone else.
The reason this is a problem for us is not the SCC being wankers (whether they are or not).
I used it because others had.Well said mate. "Youths" isn't a fair description either imo, in my gangway the average age isn't majorly young.
You don’t get it, there is no area that accommodates them, you are breaking the ground regulations by standing up
Yeah, you can guarantee they’d do all they could to reject any such application.Everyone is kinda swerving the point that the installation of any standing section wouldn't be a decision arbitrarily come to by the club but would also require sign-off by the safety licencing lot...
We can't just bang some rail seats in next month and job's a good 'un.
Something no one has said. Another childish comment.
Well compared to God knows how many years the atmosphere you lot generate is shit. But you blame others and the club. Maybe too much back patting amongst yourselves.
I see you ignore the point about money though. How as things stand, do we pay for redevelopment of a standing area?
The idea its somehow dangerous to stand behind a seat is nothing short of comical.
You can’t blame the club for this but aim your piss at SCC and that fluffy Safety GroupSUFC never fail to disappoint .. 4 weeks ago we were four points clear at the the top and looking certs from promotion , now we are four points behind top two, the club has gone to war against its own fans fans and we face the real threat of a quarter of the stadium being closed… well played United![]()
I foresee a future where we are forced to celebrate goals with jazz-hands only.According to that Burnley letter fans are allowed to stand "for short durations in periods of play where it could be deemed unnatural to remain seated."
This seems to imply that if it's an exciting match you are allowed to stand up more. If we're in the 85th minute and surging forward to find a winning goal, for example, are you allowed to stand then?
If you obey the rules to the letter, you'd be forced to stay seated when we get a winning goal.
The problem the club have, is that the people on the back few rows might want to sit down down now we have been warned. However, if those further forward refuse to sit down, then those at the back will be left with no option but to stand so they can watch the game.
No, because (whether you agree with it or not) the people that do that are doing it for the whole of humanity.what do you do during the week, sit in roads or climb bridges and disrupt traffic
I foresee a future where we are forced to celebrate goals with jazz-hands only.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?